Literature DB >> 17045473

Prognostic factors for hereditary cancer distress six months after BRCA1/2 or HNPCC genetic susceptibility testing.

Iris van Oostrom1, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer, Hugo J Duivenvoorden, Annette H J T Bröcker-Vriends, Christi J van Asperen, Rolf H Sijmons, Caroline Seynaeve, Arthur R Van Gool, Jan G M Klijn, Aad Tibben.   

Abstract

This study explored predictors for hereditary cancer distress six months after genetic susceptibility testing for a known familial BRCA1/2 or HNPCC related mutation, in order to gain insight into aspects relevant for the identification of individuals needing additional psychosocial support. Coping, illness representations, experiences with cancer in relatives and family system characteristics were assessed in 271 applicants for genetic testing before result disclosure. Hereditary cancer distress was assessed prospectively up to six months after disclosure. Regression analysis revealed that the pretest level of distress, complicated grief, the number of affected first-degree relatives and strong emotional illness representations were factors that best explained hereditary cancer distress. Other significant predictors were illness coherence, passive coping, distraction seeking, being aged <13 years when a parent was affected by cancer and family communication. Individuals who may benefit from additional support may be identified before result disclosure using a short instrument assessing the relevant aspects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17045473     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.08.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  15 in total

1.  Using a family systems approach to investigate cancer risk communication within melanoma families.

Authors:  Julie N Harris; Jennifer Hay; Alan Kuniyuki; Maryam M Asgari; Nancy Press; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Disclosure of Positive BRCA1/2-Mutation Status in Young Couples: The Journey From Uncertainty to Bonding Through Partner Support.

Authors:  Lindsey M Hoskins; Kevin Roy; June A Peters; Jennifer T Loud; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Fam Syst Health       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.950

3.  Limited impact on self-concept in individuals with Lynch syndrome; results from a national cohort study.

Authors:  Helle Vendel Petersen; Mary Jane Esplen; Steen Ladelund; Inge Bernstein; Lone Sunde; Christina Carlsson; Mef Nilbert
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  The role of disease perceptions and results sharing in psychological adaptation after genetic susceptibility testing: the REVEAL Study.

Authors:  Sato Ashida; Laura M Koehly; J Scott Roberts; Clara A Chen; Susan Hiraki; Robert C Green
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  BRCA1/2 mutation testing in breast cancer patients: a prospective study of the long-term psychological impact of approach during adjuvant radiotherapy.

Authors:  Kathryn J Schlich-Bakker; Margreet G E M Ausems; Maria Schipper; Herman F J Ten Kroode; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Jan van den Bout
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Hopefulness predicts resilience after hereditary colorectal cancer genetic testing: a prospective outcome trajectories study.

Authors:  Samuel M Y Ho; Judy W C Ho; George A Bonanno; Annie T W Chu; Emily M S Chan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Is the psychological impact of genetic testing moderated by support and sharing of test results to family and friends?

Authors:  Julie Lapointe; Michel Dorval; Catherine Noguès; Roxane Fabre; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Living with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer; experiences from and impact of genetic testing.

Authors:  C Carlsson; M Nilbert
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Psycho-social counselling in predictive genetic testing for cancer: the association between number of supportive sessions and client characteristics as assessed by psycho-social workers.

Authors:  E D Mollema; E M A Smets; M E Richard; A M Schiphorst; N J Leschot
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Psychosocial consequences of predictive genetic testing for Lynch syndrome and associations to surveillance behaviour in a 7-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Katja Aktan-Collan; Helena Kääriäinen; Heikki Järvinen; Päivi Peltomäki; Kirsi Pylvänäinen; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Ari Haukkala
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.