Literature DB >> 17043773

[Quality control in rehabilitation of patients with visual impairment: evaluation of use and benefits of optic and electronic devices].

S J Fröhlich1, C A Lackerbauer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Not only medical care and prescription of magnifying devices, but also social and professional rehabilitation are part of a complete interdisciplinary low vision service. This study provides quantitative data about the success of rehabilitation and the quality of the Low Vision Department's work. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A sample of 105 visually disabled patients, who had already been provided with magnifying aids and other rehabilitation measures by the Low Vision Department, answered a questionnaire about quality control during a follow-up visit. The survey was carried out between May and October 2004. Patients were asked to rate the different rehabilitation measures and to comment on how frequently they used the different magnifying devices. Furthermore, they were asked to judge to what degree they coped with different life situations when using or not using the low vision aids.
RESULTS: The most frequently used aids were magnifiers (61%), glasses for near vision (34%), closed circuit television (20%), and monocular telescopes (20%). Of the 105 patients, 85 (81%) reported on frequent use of the devices, with just 3 patients (3%) reporting that they hardly ever used the aids. Only 2% of the patients could read newspaper text without the use of magnifying aids, while 51% were able to do this using the aids; 46% of the patients reported that they had profited from the social and professional rehabilitation measures.
CONCLUSION: Independently from the causal ophthalmologic diagnosis, patients were found to have benefited greatly from the rehabilitation measures provided by the Low Vision Department, enabling them to take part in more activities and participate more fully in social life, thereby greatly improving their quality of life. Frequent use of the low vision aids by the patient was ensured when offered alongside continued professional support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17043773     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-006-1427-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  11 in total

1.  [Ophthalmological rehabilitation - experience at the University Eye Hospital Heidelberg].

Authors:  K Rohrschneider; I Bruder; A Blankenagel
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Evaluating the outcomes of low vision rehabilitation.

Authors:  R Harper; K Doorduyn; B Reeves; L Slater
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  [Low vision: provision of the visually handicapped with magnifying aids. II. Matching and prescription].

Authors:  Hans-Jürgen Grein
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [Low vision--management of visually impaired patients by magnifying vision aids. I: Physiological and optical basic principles].

Authors:  H J Grein
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Vision and quality-of-life.

Authors:  G C Brown
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1999

6.  [Testing visual acuity in low vision states].

Authors:  G A Hahn; M Weismann; S Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.700

7.  [At home utilization of low-vision aids by the visually impaired].

Authors:  T Rinnert; H Lindner; W Behrens-Baumann
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 0.700

8.  How effective is an integrated approach to low vision rehabilitation? Two year follow up results from south Devon.

Authors:  G N Shuttleworth; A Dunlop; J K Collins; C R James
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  [Magnifying vision aids and their use by vision-handicapped patients].

Authors:  K Krause; A Rudolph
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 0.700

10.  [Satisfaction with low vision aids].

Authors:  K Rohrschneider; R Kiel; V Pavlovska; A Blankenagel
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 0.700

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Spectrum of ophthalmologic and social rehabilitation at the Tübinger Low-Vision Clinic : a retrospective analysis for 1999-2005].

Authors:  N X Nguyen; M Weismann; S Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [The IOL-Vip system : Principles and clinical application].

Authors:  R Khoramnia; C W von Mohrenfels; J P Salgado; B Schweiger; M Engel; J Hadeler; C P Lohmann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.059

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.