Literature DB >> 17043700

Surface electromyographic amplitude-to-work ratios during isokinetic and isotonic muscle actions.

Sushmita Purkayastha1, Joel T Cramer, Cynthia A Trowbridge, A Louise Fincher, Sarah M Marek.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Isokinetic and isotonic resistance training exercises are commonly used to increase strength during musculoskeletal rehabilitation programs. Our study was designed to examine the efficacy of isokinetic and isotonic muscle actions using surface electromyographic (EMG) amplitude-to-work ratios (EMG/WK) and to extend previous findings to include a range of isokinetic velocities and isotonic loads.
OBJECTIVE: To examine work (WK), surface EMG amplitude, and EMG/WK during concentric-only maximal isokinetic muscle actions at 60, 120, 180, 240, and 300 degrees /s and isotonic muscle actions at 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% of the maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) torque during leg extension exercises.
DESIGN: A randomized, counterbalanced, cross-sectional, repeated-measures design.
SETTING: A university-based human muscle physiology research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Ten women (mean age = 22.0 +/- 2.6 years) and 10 men (mean age = 20.8 +/- 1.7 years) who were apparently healthy and recreationally active. INTERVENTION(S): Using the dominant leg, each participant performed 5 maximal voluntary concentric isokinetic leg extension exercises at randomly ordered angular velocities of 60, 120, 180, 240, and 300 degrees /s and 5 concentric isotonic leg extension exercises at randomly ordered loads of 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% of the isometric MVIC. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Work was recorded by a Biodex System 3 dynamometer, and surface EMG was recorded from the superficial quadriceps femoris muscles (vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, and vastus medialis) during the testing and was normalized to the MVIC. The EMG/WK ratios were calculated as the quotient of EMG amplitude (muVrms) and WK (J) during the concentric phase of each exercise.
RESULTS: Isotonic EMG/WK remained unchanged ( P > .05) from 10% to 50% MVIC, but isokinetic EMG/WK increased ( P < .05) from 60 to 300 degrees /s. Isotonic EMG/WK was greater ( P < .05) than isokinetic EMG/WK for 50% MVIC versus 60 degrees /s, 40% MVIC versus 120 degrees /s, and 30% MVIC versus 180 degrees /s; however, no differences were noted ( P > .05) between 20% MVIC versus 240 degrees /s or 10% MVIC versus 300 degrees /s. An 18% decrease in active range of motion was seen for the isotonic muscle actions, from 10% to 50% MVIC, and a 3% increase in range of motion for the isokinetic muscle actions from 60 to 300 degrees /s was also observed. Furthermore, the peak angular velocities for the isotonic muscle actions ranged from 272.9 to 483.0 degrees /s for 50% and 10% MVIC, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: When considering EMG/WK, peak angular velocity, and range of motion together, our data indicate that maximal isokinetic muscle actions at 240 degrees /s or controlled-velocity isotonic muscle actions at 10%, 20%, or 30% MVIC may maximize the amount of muscle activation per unit of WK done during the early stages of musculoskeletal rehabilitation. These results may be useful to allied health professionals who incorporate open-chain resistance training exercises during the early phases of rehabilitation and researchers who use isotonic or isokinetic modes of resistance exercise to examine muscle function.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 17043700      PMCID: PMC1569550     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  35 in total

1.  Mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power output during maximal, concentric, isokinetic muscle actions.

Authors:  J T Cramer; T J Housh; G O Johnson; K T Ebersole; S R Perry; A J Bull
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Gender, muscle, and velocity comparisons of mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses during isokinetic muscle actions.

Authors:  Joel T Cramer; Terry J Housh; Joseph P Weir; Glen O Johnson; Joseph M Berning; Sharon R Perry; Anthony J Bull
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.221

3.  Technics of progressive resistance exercise.

Authors:  T L DELORME; A L WATKINS
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1948-05       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Effects of isokinetic, isotonic and isometric submaximal exercise on heart rate and blood pressure.

Authors:  F Iellamo; J M Legramante; G Raimondi; F Castrucci; C Damiani; C Foti; G Peruzzi; I Caruso
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1997

5.  Neuromuscular adaptations in isokinetic, isotonic, and agility training programs.

Authors:  E M Wojtys; L J Huston; P D Taylor; S D Bastian
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Associations between spectral representation of the surface electromyogram and fiber type distribution and size in human masseter muscle.

Authors:  J R Westbury; T G Shaughnessy
Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1987 Oct-Nov

7.  Electromyographic, peak torque, and power relationships during isokinetic movement.

Authors:  J M Rothstein; A Delitto; D R Sinacore; S J Rose
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1983-06

8.  Isokinetic, isometric and isotonic strength relationships.

Authors:  J J Knapik; J E Wright; R H Mawdsley; J M Braun
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Isometric, isotonic, and isokinetic torque variations in four muscle groups through a range of joint motion.

Authors:  J J Knapik; J E Wright; R H Mawdsley; J Braun
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1983-06

10.  Postsurgical knee rehabilitation. A five year study of four methods and 5,381 patients.

Authors:  K E Timm
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  5 in total

1.  Neuromuscular adaptations to 8-week strength training: isotonic versus isokinetic mode.

Authors:  Anthony Remaud; Christophe Cornu; Arnaud Guével
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Evaluation of the Electromyographic Amplitude-to-Work Ratio in the Infraspinatus Muscle During External Shoulder Rotation Exercises: A Comparison of Concentric Isotonic and Isokinetic Exercises.

Authors:  Jung-Ho Park; Seok Won Chung; Seoung-Joon Lee; Jong-Won Lee; Kyung-Soo Oh
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-07-07

3.  Symptomatic and functional responses to concentric-eccentric isokinetic versus eccentric-only isotonic exercise.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Parr; Joshua F Yarrow; Carolyn M Garbo; Paul A Borsa
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Retentive capacity of power output and linear versus non-linear mapping of power loss in the isotonic muscular endurance test.

Authors:  Hong-Qi Xu; Yong-Tai Xue; Zi-Jian Zhou; Koon Teck Koh; Xin Xu; Ji-Peng Shi; Shou-Wei Zhang; Xin Zhang; Jing Cai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Resistance training does not induce uniform adaptations to quadriceps.

Authors:  Gerald T Mangine; Michael J Redd; Adam M Gonzalez; Jeremy R Townsend; Adam J Wells; Adam R Jajtner; Kyle S Beyer; Carleigh H Boone; Michael B La Monica; Jeffrey R Stout; David H Fukuda; Nicholas A Ratamess; Jay R Hoffman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.