Literature DB >> 11102905

Mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power output during maximal, concentric, isokinetic muscle actions.

J T Cramer1, T J Housh, G O Johnson, K T Ebersole, S R Perry, A J Bull.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the velocity-related patterns for mechanomyographic (MMG) amplitude, electromyographic (EMG) amplitude, mean power output (MP), and peak torque (PT) of the superficial muscles of the quadriceps femoris (vastus lateralis [VL], rectus femoris [RF], and vastus medialis [VM]) during maximal, concentric, isokinetic leg extensions. Twelve adult women (mean +/- SD: 22 +/- 3 years of age) performed such leg extensions at velocities of 60 degrees, 120 degrees, 180 degrees, 240 degrees, and 300 degrees /s on a Cybex 6000 dynamometer. PT decreased (P < 0.05) across velocity to 240 degrees /s. MP and MMG amplitude for each muscle (VL, RF, and VM) increased (P < 0.05) with velocity to 240 degrees /s and then plateaued. EMG amplitude increased (P < 0.05) to 240&amp;deg/s for the VL, remained unchanged across velocity (P > 0.05) for the RF, and increased (P < 0.05) to 300 degrees /s for the VM. The results indicated close similarities between the velocity-related patterns for MMG amplitude and MP, but dissociations among EMG amplitude, MMG amplitude, and PT. These findings support the recent hypothesis that MMG amplitude is more closely related to MP than PT during maximal, concentric, isokinetic muscle actions and, therefore, may be useful for monitoring training-induced changes in muscle power. Copyright 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11102905     DOI: 10.1002/1097-4598(200012)23:12<1826::aid-mus5>3.0.co;2-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  8 in total

1.  The acute effects of static stretching on peak torque, mean power output, electromyography, and mechanomyography.

Authors:  J T Cramer; T J Housh; J P Weir; G O Johnson; J W Coburn; T W Beck
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Is fatigue all in your head? A critical review of the central governor model.

Authors:  J P Weir; T W Beck; J T Cramer; T J Housh
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Muscle-related differences in mechanomyography frequency-force relationships are model dependent.

Authors:  Trent J Herda; Michael A Cooper
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Surface electromyographic amplitude-to-work ratios during isokinetic and isotonic muscle actions.

Authors:  Sushmita Purkayastha; Joel T Cramer; Cynthia A Trowbridge; A Louise Fincher; Sarah M Marek
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Acute Effects of Static and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Stretching on Muscle Strength and Power Output.

Authors:  Sarah M Marek; Joel T Cramer; A Louise Fincher; Laurie L Massey; Suzanne M Dangelmaier; Sushmita Purkayastha; Kristi A Fitz; Julie Y Culbertson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 6.  Mechanomyographic amplitude and frequency responses during dynamic muscle actions: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Travis W Beck; Terry J Housh; Joel T Cramer; Joseph P Weir; Glen O Johnson; Jared W Coburn; Moh H Malek; Michelle Mielke
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Inspiratory muscle activation increases with COPD severity as confirmed by non-invasive mechanomyographic analysis.

Authors:  Leonardo Sarlabous; Abel Torres; José A Fiz; Juana M Martínez-Llorens; Joaquim Gea; Raimon Jané
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evidence towards improved estimation of respiratory muscle effort from diaphragm mechanomyographic signals with cardiac vibration interference using sample entropy with fixed tolerance values.

Authors:  Leonardo Sarlabous; Abel Torres; José A Fiz; Raimon Jané
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.