Literature DB >> 17043692

The independent and interactive effects of navicular drop and quadriceps angle on neuromuscular responses to a weight-bearing perturbation.

Sandra J Shultz1, Christopher R Carcia, Bruce M Gansneder, David H Perrin.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Little is known about the effects of static alignment on neuromuscular control of the knee during dynamic motion.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the isolated and combined effects of quadriceps angle (QA) and navicular drop (ND) on neuromuscular responses to a weight-bearing perturbation.
DESIGN: Mixed-model, repeated-measures design.
SETTING: Sports medicine and athletic training research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-nine National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I collegiate female athletes, classified with below-average ND and QA (LND-LQA); below-average ND and above-average QA (LND-HQA); above-average ND and below-average QA (HND-LQA); or above-average ND and QA (HND-HQA). INTERVENTION(S): A lower extremity perturbation device produced a forward and either internal or external rotation of the trunk and femur on the weight-bearing tibia to evoke a reflex response. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Neuromuscular responses were examined in the quadriceps, hamstrings, and gastrocnemius muscles: preperturbation amplitude 50 milliseconds before the perturbation, reflex time, and postperturbation amplitude 150 milliseconds immediately postperturbation.
RESULTS: Navicular drop had the greatest effect on preperturbation amplitude of the lateral hamstrings and postperturbation amplitude of all muscles, with greater activation amplitude noted in subjects in the HND classifications. Quadriceps angle primarily affected reflex time of the quadriceps; in subjects with LQA, reflex time was faster for internal rotation than external rotation perturbations. The interaction between ND and QA had the greatest effect on reflex time of the lateral hamstrings. For internal rotation perturbations, subjects in the LND classifications had faster reflex times in the lateral hamstrings if they had HQA values rather than LQA values. With external rotation perturbations, HND-LQA subjects had slower reflex times than those in all other alignment classifications.
CONCLUSIONS: Navicular drop and QA have both independent and interactive effects on neuromuscular responses to a weight-bearing, rotational perturbation. These interactive effects highlight the importance of considering the entire lower extremity posture rather than a single alignment characteristic, given the potential for one alignment factor to compensate for or interact with another.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 17043692      PMCID: PMC1569553     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  37 in total

1.  Structural measures as predictors of injury basketball players.

Authors:  J P Shambaugh; A Klein; J H Herbert
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Strain within the anterior cruciate ligament during hamstring and quadriceps activity.

Authors:  P Renström; S W Arms; T S Stanwyck; R J Johnson; M H Pope
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Navicular drop as a composite measure of excessive pronation.

Authors:  M J Mueller; J V Host; B J Norton
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  1993-04

4.  Parameters and comparisons of the quadriceps angle of college-aged men and women in the supine and standing positions.

Authors:  L H Woodland; R S Francis
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Anterior-posterior and rotational displacement of the tibia elicited by quadriceps contraction.

Authors:  S Hirokawa; M Solomonow; Y Lu; Z P Lou; R D'Ambrosia
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Bilateral within-subject Q angle asymmetry in young adult females and males.

Authors:  L A Livingston; J L Mandigo
Journal:  Biomed Sci Instrum       Date:  1997

Review 7.  Lower extremity morphology and alignment and risk of overuse injury.

Authors:  O A Ilahi; H W Kohl
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.638

8.  Acute Orthotic Intervention Does Not Affect Muscular Response Times and Activation Patterns at the Knee.

Authors:  Holly M Rose; Sandra J Shultz; Brent L Arnold; Bruce M Gansneder; David H Perrin
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Effects of arch height of the foot on angular motion of the lower extremities in running.

Authors:  B M Nigg; G K Cole; W Nachbauer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Transfer of movement between calcaneus and tibia in vitro.

Authors:  B Hintermann; B M Nigg; C Sommer; G K Cole
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.063

View more
  9 in total

1.  Greater body mass index and hip abduction muscle strength predict noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury in female Japanese high school basketball players.

Authors:  Kengo Shimozaki; Junsuke Nakase; Yasushi Takata; Yosuke Shima; Katsuhiko Kitaoka; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Risk factors for noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury in female high school basketball and handball players: A prospective 3-year cohort study.

Authors:  Junsuke Nakase; Katsuhiko Kitaoka; Yosuke Shima; Takeshi Oshima; Goro Sakurai; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2020-08-08

3.  Identifying relationships among lower extremity alignment characteristics.

Authors:  Anh-Dung Nguyen; Sandra J Shultz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  The Relationship Between Lower Extremity Alignment Characteristics and Anterior Knee Joint Laxity.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Beverly J Levine
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.843

5.  Relationships between lower extremity alignment and the quadriceps angle.

Authors:  Anh-Dung Nguyen; Michelle C Boling; Beverly Levine; Sandra J Shultz
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.638

6.  Predictors of lower extremity injuries in team sports (PROFITS-study): a study protocol.

Authors:  Kati Pasanen; Marko T Rossi; Jari Parkkari; Ari Heinonen; Kathrin Steffen; Grethe Myklebust; Tron Krosshaug; Tommi Vasankari; Pekka Kannus; Janne Avela; Juha-Pekka Kulmala; Jarmo Perttunen; Urho M Kujala; Roald Bahr
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2015-12-11

7.  Measurement of the quadriceps (Q) angle with respect to various body parameters in young Arab population.

Authors:  Ramada R Khasawneh; Mohammed Z Allouh; Ejlal Abu-El-Rub
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Musculoskeletal examination in young athletes and non-athletes: the Finnish Health Promoting Sports Club (FHPSC) study.

Authors:  Kerttu Toivo; Pekka Kannus; Sami Kokko; Lauri Alanko; Olli J Heinonen; Raija Korpelainen; Kai Savonen; Harri Selänne; Tommi Vasankari; Lasse Kannas; Urho M Kujala; Jari Villberg; Jari Parkkari
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2018-05-30

9.  Effect of Prophylactic Knee Bracing on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Agonist and Antagonist Muscle Forces During Perturbed Walking.

Authors:  Raneem Haddara; Vahidreza Jafari Harandi; Peter Vee Sin Lee
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.