BACKGROUND: Health care-associated infections from invasive medical devices in the intensive care unit (ICU) are a major threat to patient safety. Most published studies of ICU-acquired infections have come from industrialized western countries. In a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System report, the U.S. pooled mean rates of central venous catheter (CVC)-related bloodstream infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and catheter-associated urinary tract infections were 4.0 per 1000 CVC days, 5.4 per 1000 mechanical ventilator days, and 3.9 per Foley catheter days, respectively. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the incidence of device-associated infections in the ICUs of developing countries. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective cohort surveillance of device-associated infection by using the CDC NNIS System definitions. SETTING: 55 ICUs of 46 hospitals in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, India, Mexico, Morocco, Peru, and Turkey that are members of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC). MEASUREMENTS: Rates of device-associated infection per 100 patients and per 1000 device days. RESULTS: During 2002-2005, 21,069 patients who were hospitalized in ICUs for an aggregate 137,740 days acquired 3095 device-associated infections for an overall rate of 14.7% or 22.5 infections per 1000 ICU days. Ventilator-associated pneumonia posed the greatest risk (41% of all device-associated infections or 24.1 cases [range, 10.0 to 52.7 cases] per 1000 ventilator days), followed by CVC-related bloodstream infections (30% of all device-associated infections or 12.5 cases [range, 7.8 to 18.5 cases] per 1000 catheter days) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (29% of all device-associated infections or 8.9 cases [range, 1.7 to 12.8 cases] per 1000 catheter days). Notably, 84% of Staphylococcus aureus infections were caused by methicillin-resistant strains, 51% of Enterobacteriaceae isolates were resistant to ceftriaxone, and 59% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were resistant to fluoroquinolones. The crude mortality rate for patients with device-associated infections ranged from 35.2% (for CVC-associated bloodstream infection) to 44.9% (for ventilator-associated pneumonia). LIMITATIONS: These initial data are not adequate to represent any entire country, and likely variations in the efficiency of surveillance and institutional resources may have affected the rates that were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Device-associated infections in the ICUs of these developing countries pose greater threats to patient safety than in U.S. ICUs. Active infection control programs that perform surveillance of infection and implement guidelines for prevention can improve patient safety and must become a priority in every country.
BACKGROUND: Health care-associated infections from invasive medical devices in the intensive care unit (ICU) are a major threat to patient safety. Most published studies of ICU-acquired infections have come from industrialized western countries. In a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System report, the U.S. pooled mean rates of central venous catheter (CVC)-related bloodstream infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and catheter-associated urinary tract infections were 4.0 per 1000 CVC days, 5.4 per 1000 mechanical ventilator days, and 3.9 per Foley catheter days, respectively. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the incidence of device-associated infections in the ICUs of developing countries. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective cohort surveillance of device-associated infection by using the CDC NNIS System definitions. SETTING: 55 ICUs of 46 hospitals in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, India, Mexico, Morocco, Peru, and Turkey that are members of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC). MEASUREMENTS: Rates of device-associated infection per 100 patients and per 1000 device days. RESULTS: During 2002-2005, 21,069 patients who were hospitalized in ICUs for an aggregate 137,740 days acquired 3095 device-associated infections for an overall rate of 14.7% or 22.5 infections per 1000 ICU days. Ventilator-associated pneumonia posed the greatest risk (41% of all device-associated infections or 24.1 cases [range, 10.0 to 52.7 cases] per 1000 ventilator days), followed by CVC-related bloodstream infections (30% of all device-associated infections or 12.5 cases [range, 7.8 to 18.5 cases] per 1000 catheter days) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (29% of all device-associated infections or 8.9 cases [range, 1.7 to 12.8 cases] per 1000 catheter days). Notably, 84% of Staphylococcus aureus infections were caused by methicillin-resistant strains, 51% of Enterobacteriaceae isolates were resistant to ceftriaxone, and 59% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were resistant to fluoroquinolones. The crude mortality rate for patients with device-associated infections ranged from 35.2% (for CVC-associated bloodstream infection) to 44.9% (for ventilator-associated pneumonia). LIMITATIONS: These initial data are not adequate to represent any entire country, and likely variations in the efficiency of surveillance and institutional resources may have affected the rates that were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Device-associated infections in the ICUs of these developing countries pose greater threats to patient safety than in U.S. ICUs. Active infection control programs that perform surveillance of infection and implement guidelines for prevention can improve patient safety and must become a priority in every country.
Authors: M Guembe; P Martín-Rabadán; A Echenagusia; F Camúñez; G Rodríguez-Rosales; G Simó; M Echenagusia; E Bouza Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Mohammad D Mansouri; Timothy J Opperman; John D Williams; Charles Stager; Rabih O Darouiche Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-01-23 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: V D Rosenthal; S K Todi; C Álvarez-Moreno; M Pawar; A Karlekar; A A Zeggwagh; Z Mitrev; F E Udwadia; J A Navoa-Ng; M Chakravarthy; R Salomao; S Sahu; A Dilek; S S Kanj; H Guanche-Garcell; L E Cuéllar; G Ersoz; A Nevzat-Yalcin; N Jaggi; E A Medeiros; G Ye; Ö A Akan; T Mapp; A Castañeda-Sabogal; L Matta-Cortés; F Sirmatel; N Olarte; H Torres-Hernández; N Barahona-Guzmán; R Fernández-Hidalgo; W Villamil-Gómez; D Sztokhamer; S Forciniti; R Berba; H Turgut; C Bin; Y Yang; I Pérez-Serrato; C E Lastra; S Singh; D Ozdemir; S Ulusoy Journal: Infection Date: 2012-06-19 Impact factor: 3.553
Authors: Bryan B Hsu; Sze Yinn Wong; Paula T Hammond; Jianzhu Chen; Alexander M Klibanov Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-12-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Alice Reshamwala; Kathryn McBroom; Yong Il Choi; Linda LaTour; Antoinette Ramos-Embler; Rowena Steele; Virginia Lomugdang; Margaret Newman; Colleen Reid; Yanfang Zhao; Bradi B Granger Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: S Kouda; Y Fujiue; Y Watanabe; M Ohara; S Kayama; F Kato; J Hisatsune; K Tsuruda; A Matsubara; M Doi; M Kuwabara; M Sugai Journal: Infection Date: 2011-04-22 Impact factor: 3.553