Literature DB >> 17041322

Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

Kathryn Dumbleton1, Nancy Keir, Amir Moezzi, Yunwei Feng, Lyndon Jones, Desmond Fonn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Silicone hydrogel (SiH) lenses offer many physiological advantages for daily wear (DW) in addition to the continuous-wear modality for which they were originally developed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical performance and physiological responses in a group of successful long-term wearers of conventional hydrogel lenses when refitted with DW SiH contact lenses.
METHODS: Eighty-seven successful soft lens wearers (8.4+/-4.7 years of prior lens wear) participated in this study. Bulbar and limbal hyperemia were subjectively graded and digitally photographed for subsequent masked objective evaluation. Subjective symptoms were scored using visual analog scales. In addition, refractive error, corneal curvature, and corneal thickness were measured. All subjects were refitted with Focus Night & Day (lotrafilcon A) SiH lenses; however, to reduce the potential for bias, they were informed that they were being randomly assigned to wear either low oxygen permeability (Dk) lenses or high Dk SiH lenses and were "masked" as to their lens assignment. Subjects returned after 1 week, 1 month, and 2 months of DW, at which time all gradings, photographs, and measurements were repeated. End-of-day subjective symptoms were also graded periodically during the study.
RESULTS: Ninety-three percent of subjects were successfully refitted. Both objective and subjective evaluations showed that bulbar and limbal hyperemia decreased significantly in all quadrants during the study (p<0.001), particularly for those subjects with greater baseline hyperemia (p<0.001). Subjects reported a concurrent reduction in end-of-day dryness and improved end-of-day comfort compared with their habitual lenses (p<0.001). No significant changes in refractive error, tarsal papillary response, corneal curvature, or corneal thickness were found during the study.
CONCLUSIONS: Hyperemia in contact lens wearers may be attributed to a number of factors, including hypoxia. Refitting existing low Dk lens wearers with SiH lenses on a DW basis can result in a decrease in hyperemia, which may be significant for some subjects and also results in improvements in symptoms of dryness and discomfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17041322     DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000237547.35542.b8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Correct contact lens hygiene].

Authors:  S Blümle; T Kaercher; R Khaireddin
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Ocular surface and tear film status among contact lens wearers and non-wearers who use VDT at work: comparing three different lens types.

Authors:  Ana Tauste; Elena Ronda; Valborg Baste; Magne Bråtveit; Bente E Moen; María-Del-Mar Seguí Crespo
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Continuous 24-hour monitoring of intraocular pressure patterns with a contact lens sensor: safety, tolerability, and reproducibility in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Kaweh Mansouri; Felipe A Medeiros; Ali Tafreshi; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12

4.  Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of therapeutic bandage contact lenses on post-cataract surgery patients.

Authors:  Dan-Na Shi; Hang Song; Tong Ding; Wei-Qiang Qiu; Wei Wang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Lifetime Corneal Edema Load Model.

Authors:  Russell Thomson; Rabia Mobeen; Arthur Ho; Desmond Fonn; Deborah F Sweeney
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  A multicenter investigation of OPTI-FREE RepleniSH multi-purpose disinfecting solution impact on soft contact lens patient comfort.

Authors:  Glenn S Corbin; Linda Bennett; Louis Espejo; Suzanne Carducci; Andrew Sacco; Robert Hannigan; Stuart Schatz
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-02

7.  Corneal Swelling with Cosmetic etafilcon A Lenses versus No Lens Wear.

Authors:  Amir M Moezzi; Jalaiah Varikooty; Marc Schulze; William Ngo; Kathrine Osborn Lorenz; Danielle Boree; Lyndon W Jones
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.973

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.