Literature DB >> 17040419

Double-masked randomised placebo-controlled trial of the effect of prismatic corrections on rate of reading and the relationship with symptoms.

Claire I O'Leary1, Bruce J W Evans.   

Abstract

Practitioners' decisions on when to intervene in decompensated heterophoria are often based on symptoms, which are in some cases an unreliable indicator of whether an intervention will be helpful. The aim of our study was to determine when prismatic corrections improve performance at a measure of dynamic visual function: the Wilkins Rate of Reading Test (WRRT). All participants manifested an aligning prism (associated heterophoria) on the near Mallett Unit of 0.5Delta or greater. There were 80 participants, of whom 58 had exophoria, 15 esophoria, and seven hyperphoria. The effect of the aligning prism on the WRRT was compared with a control lens using a double-masked randomised design. For exophoria, an aligning prism of 2Delta and above has a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 79% for improving performance at the WRRT by 5% or more. It is not possible from our data to achieve a good compromise between sensitivity and specificity for the other types of heterophoria. Patients in the horizontal (but not vertical) heterophoria groups had significantly more symptoms than a control group. The patients whose visual performance is improved by prismatic correction are not necessarily those who report the most symptoms. Our data suggest that exophoric patients of any age are likely to have improved visual performance with an intervention if they have an aligning prism of 2Delta or more, even in the absence of symptoms. We stress that although the Mallett Unit Fixation Disparity test provides useful information, its results need to be considered in the overall context of the patient's symptoms, lifestyle, and the results of other optometric tests. Although this study evaluated prismatic corrections, we note that interventions for decompensated heterophoria include not only prismatic corrections, but also eye exercises and refractive modification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17040419     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00400.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  12 in total

Review 1.  Non-surgical interventions for convergence insufficiency.

Authors:  Mitchell Scheiman; Jane Gwiazda; Tianjing Li
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-03-16

2.  Effects of Prism Eyeglasses on Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity.

Authors:  Volkhard Schroth; Roland Joos; Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Reliability and validity of a Kannada rate of reading test.

Authors:  Krithica Srinivasan; Gopee Krishnan; Arnold Wilkins; Peter Allen
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Clinical Use of the Kannada and English Rate of Reading Tests.

Authors:  Krithica Srinivasan; James M Gilchrist; Gopee Krishnan; Arnold Wilkins; Peter M Allen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-20

5.  Is the aligning prism measured with the Mallett unit correlated with fusional vergence reserves?

Authors:  Miriam L Conway; Jennifer Thomas; Ahalya Subramanian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The prescribing of prisms in clinical practice.

Authors:  Lyle S Gray
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  A survey of the criteria for prescribing in cases of borderline refractive errors.

Authors:  Einat Shneor; Bruce John William Evans; Yael Fine; Yehudit Shapira; Liat Gantz; Ariela Gordon-Shaag
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

8.  Does an iPad fixation disparity test give equivalent results to the Mallett near fixation disparity test?

Authors:  Ketan R Parmar; Christine Dickinson; Bruce J W Evans
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2019-09-07

9.  Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of clinical signs for screening of convergence insufficiency in young adults.

Authors:  Byeong-Yeon Moon; Sang-Yeob Kim; Dong-Sik Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An investigation of low power convex lenses (adds) for eyestrain in the digital age (CLEDA).

Authors:  Robert Yammouni; Bruce Jw Evans
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2020-04-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.