Literature DB >> 17039303

Intracranial pulse pressure amplitude levels determined during preoperative assessment of subjects with possible idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

P K Eide1, A Brean.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It was previously reported that the intracranial pulse pressure amplitudes were elevated in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) patients responding to shunt surgery. In this study, pulse pressure amplitudes were determined in all patients referred for tentative iNPH, and patients were selected for shunt surgery based on the determination of their threshold levels of intracranial pulse pressure amplitudes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients referred to our department for tentative iNPH during a 12 months time period were included. Using intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring the intracranial pulse pressure amplitudes were determined as the mean wave amplitude in consecutive 6-seconds time windows. Intracranial pulse pressure amplitudes were defined as being elevated when the mean wave amplitudes were either >or=4 mmHg in >or=70%, >or=5 mmHg in >or=40% or >or=6 mmHg in >or=10% of the ICP recording time. Shunt treatment was offered to those with elevated mean wave amplitudes. Clinical state was assessed by using a NPH Grading Scale and the Stein-Langfitt scale before ICP monitoring, and then repeated after 12 months.
RESULTS: Among the 40 iNPH patients included during the 12 months period, the mean wave amplitudes were elevated in 24 patients (60%), while not being elevated in 16 (40%). Neither pre-operative clinical state, radiological ventricular size nor co-morbidity differed between patient groups with elevated or non-elevated mean wave amplitudes. In the shunted patients who had pre-operatively elevated mean wave amplitudes, 91% had very significant clinical change after 12 months (median change in NPH score +4). In those with non-elevated amplitudes and no shunt, clinical state was somewhat worse after 12 months (median change in NPH score -1).
CONCLUSIONS: In this one-year material, mean wave amplitudes were elevated in 60% of iNPH patients. In those with elevated mean wave amplitudes who were treated with shunt, 91% had a significant clinical response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17039303     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-006-0896-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  18 in total

1.  Assessment of craniospinal pressure-volume indices.

Authors:  A Wåhlin; K Ambarki; R Birgander; N Alperin; J Malm; A Eklund
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  The differential diagnosis and treatment of normal-pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Michael Kiefer; Andreas Unterberg
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  Natural history of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Ahmed K Toma; Simon Stapleton; Marios C Papadopoulos; Neil D Kitchen; Laurence D Watkins
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Vascular parkinsonism or idiopathic NPH? New insights from CSF pressure analysis.

Authors:  Claudia Giliberto; Giovanni Mostile; Salvatore Lo Fermo; Ester Reggio; Giorgia Sciacca; Alessandra Nicoletti; Mario Zappia
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Intracranial pressure pulse waveform correlates with aqueductal cerebrospinal fluid stroke volume.

Authors:  Robert Hamilton; Kevin Baldwin; Jennifer Fuller; Paul Vespa; Xiao Hu; Marvin Bergsneider
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-09-20

6.  Pattern recognition of overnight intracranial pressure slow waves using morphological features of intracranial pressure pulse.

Authors:  Magdalena Kasprowicz; Shadnaz Asgari; Marvin Bergsneider; Marek Czosnyka; Robert Hamilton; Xiao Hu
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  A subspace decomposition approach toward recognizing valid pulsatile signals.

Authors:  Shadnaz Asgari; Peng Xu; Marvin Bergsneider; Xiao Hu
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.833

8.  Pulsatile intracranial pressure and cerebral autoregulation after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  D K Radolovich; M J H Aries; G Castellani; A Corona; A Lavinio; P Smielewski; J D Pickard; M Czosnyka
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  The pulsating brain: A review of experimental and clinical studies of intracranial pulsatility.

Authors:  Mark E Wagshul; Per K Eide; Joseph R Madsen
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2011-01-18

Review 10.  A Review of Clinical Outcomes for Gait and Other Variables in the Surgical Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Richard Shaw; Neil Mahant; Erica Jacobson; Brian Owler
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2016-02-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.