Literature DB >> 17038904

Developing a prognostic model for 90-day mortality after liver transplantation based on pretransplant recipient factors.

James D Lewsey1, Muhammad Dawwas, Lynn P Copley, Alexander Gimson, Jan H P Van der Meulen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current statistical prognostic models for mortality after liver transplantation do not have good discriminatory ability. Furthermore, the methodology used to develop these models is often flawed. The objective of this paper is to develop a prognostic model for 90-day mortality after liver transplantation based on pretransplant recipient factors, employing a rigorous model development method.
METHODS: We used data on 4,829 patient that were prospectively collected for the UK & Ireland Liver Transplant Audit. Switching regression was employed to impute missing values combined with a bootstrapping approach for variable selection.
RESULTS: In all, 452 patients (9.4%) died within 90 days of their transplantation. The final prognostic model was well calibrated and discriminated moderately well between patients who did and who did not die (c-statistic 0.65, 95% CI [0.63, 0.68]). Although discrimination was not excellent overall, the results showed that those patients with a "low" chance of dying within 90 days of their transplant and those with a "high" chance of dying could be differentiated from patients with a "intermediate" chance.
CONCLUSIONS: Our model can provide transplant candidates with predictions of their early posttransplantation prospects before any donor information is known, which is essential information for patients with end-stage liver disease for whom liver transplantation is a treatment option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17038904     DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000235516.99977.95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  6 in total

1.  Orthotopic liver transplantation in an adult with cholesterol ester storage disease.

Authors:  Graeme K Ambler; Matthew Hoare; Rebecca Brais; Ashley Shaw; Andrew Butler; Paul Flynn; Patrick Deegan; William J H Griffiths
Journal:  JIMD Rep       Date:  2012-07-24

2.  Living donor liver transplantation for high model for end-stage liver disease score: What have we learned?

Authors:  Hany Dabbous; Mohammad Sakr; Sara Abdelhakam; Iman Montasser; Mohamed Bahaa; Hany Said; Mahmoud El-Meteini
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-08-08

3.  The liver transplant risk score prognosticates the outcomes of liver transplant recipients at listing.

Authors:  Christof Kaltenmeier; Dana Jorgensen; Stalin Dharmayan; Subhashini Ayloo; Vikrant Rachakonda; David A Geller; Samer Tohme; Michele Molinari
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Pretransplant prediction of posttransplant survival for liver recipients with benign end-stage liver diseases: a nonlinear model.

Authors:  Ming Zhang; Fei Yin; Bo Chen; You Ping Li; Lu Nan Yan; Tian Fu Wen; Bo Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Impact of recipient functional status on 1-year liver transplant outcomes.

Authors:  Natasha H Dolgin; Babak Movahedi; Frederick A Anderson; Isabel Ma Brüggenwirth; Paulo N Martins; Adel Bozorgzadeh
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2019-11-20

6.  Preoperative Stratification of Liver Transplant Recipients: Validation of the LTRS.

Authors:  Michele Molinari; Dana Jorgensen; Subhashini Ayloo; Stalin Dharmayan; Christof Kaltenmeier; Rajil B Mehta; Naudia Jonassaint
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 5.385

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.