Literature DB >> 17038885

A rapid and inexpensive method for anticipating severe toxicity to fluorouracil and fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

Joseph Ciccolini1, Cédric Mercier, Alexandre Evrard, Laetitia Dahan, Jean-Christophe Boyer, Florence Duffaud, Karine Richard, Carmelo Blanquicett, Gérard Milano, Aurore Blesius, Alain Durand, Jean-François Seitz, Roger Favre, Bruno Lacarelle.   

Abstract

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency leads to dramatic overexposure to fluorouracil (5-FU), resulting in a potentially lethal outcome in patients treated with standard doses. The aim of this study was to validate, in a routine clinical setting, a simple and rapid method to determine the DPD status in a subset of cancer patients, all presenting with life-threatening toxicities following 5-FU or capecitabine intake. In this study, 80 out of 615 patients (13%) suffered severe toxicities, including 5 lethal ones (0.8%), during or after chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine drug. Patients with severe toxicities were treated with 5-FU (76 patients) or capecitabine-containing protocols (4 patients). Simplified uracil to di-hydrouracil (U/UH2) ratio determination in plasma was retrospectively performed in these 80 patients, as a surrogate marker of DPD activity. When possible, 5-FU Css determination was performed, and screenings for the canonical IVS14+1G>A mutation were systematically carried out. Comparison of the U/UH2 ratios with a reference, non-toxic population, showed abnormal values suggesting impaired DPD activity in 57 out of the 80 toxic patients (71%) included in this study, and in 4 out of 5 patients (80%) with a fatal outcome. Similarly, drug exposures up to 15 times higher than the range observed in the non-toxic population were also observed. Importantly, no IVS14+1G>A mutation was found in these patients, including those displaying the most severe or lethal toxicities. These data warrant systematic detection of DPD-deficient patients prior to fluoropyrimidine administration, including when oral capecitabine (Xeloda) is scheduled. Finally, the simplified methodology presented here proved to be a low cost and rapid way to identify routinely patients at risk of toxicity with 5-FU or capecitabine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17038885     DOI: 10.1097/01.ftd.0000245771.82720.c7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  19 in total

1.  Capecitabine-Induced Severe Toxicity Secondary to DPD Deficiency and Successful Treatment with Low Dose 5-Fluorouracil.

Authors:  Saranya Kodali; Venu Bathini; Paul Rava; Eswar Tipirneni
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2017-03

2.  Frequent intragenic rearrangements of DPYD in colorectal tumours.

Authors:  A B P van Kuilenburg; M-C Etienne-Grimaldi; A Mahamat; J Meijer; P Laurent-Puig; S Olschwang; M-P Gaub; R C M Hennekam; D Benchimol; S Houry; C Letoublon; F-N Gilly; D Pezet; T Andre; J-L Faucheron; A Abderrahim-Ferkoune; R Vijzelaar; B Pradere; G Milano
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.550

3.  Beating the odds: efficacy and toxicity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase-driven adaptive dosing of 5-FU in patients with digestive cancer.

Authors:  Manon Launay; Laetitia Dahan; Manon Duval; Anne Rodallec; Gérard Milano; Muriel Duluc; Bruno Lacarelle; Joseph Ciccolini; Jean-Francois Seitz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Pharmacogenetics research on chemotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer over the last 20 years.

Authors:  Mariusz Panczyk
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Clinically relevant genetic variations in drug metabolizing enzymes.

Authors:  Navin Pinto; M Eileen Dolan
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.731

6.  Evaluation of 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics in cancer patients with a c.1905+1G>A mutation in DPYD by means of a Bayesian limited sampling strategy.

Authors:  André B P van Kuilenburg; Peter Häusler; Andreas Schalhorn; Michael W T Tanck; Johannes H Proost; Christoph Terborg; Detlev Behnke; Wolfgang Schwabe; Kati Jabschinsky; Jan Gerard Maring
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of lipofufol, a new triple stealth liposomal formulation of modulated 5-fu: impact on efficacy and toxicity.

Authors:  Raphaelle Fanciullino; Séverine Mollard; Sarah Giacometti; Yael Berda-Haddad; Mohamed Chefrour; Claude Aubert; Athanassios Iliadis; Joseph Ciccolini
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Pharmacokinetic analysis of metronomic capecitabine in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Teresa Di Desidero; Paola Orlandi; Anna Fioravanti; Chiara Cremolini; Fotios Loupakis; Federica Marmorino; Carlotta Antoniotti; Gianluca Masi; Sara Lonardi; Francesca Bergamo; Vittorina Zagonel; Alfredo Falcone; Guido Bocci
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.850

9.  Strong association of a common dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene polymorphism with fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity in cancer patients.

Authors:  Eva Gross; Birgit Busse; Matthias Riemenschneider; Steffi Neubauer; Katharina Seck; Hanns-Georg Klein; Marion Kiechle; Florian Lordick; Alfons Meindl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The use of capecitabine in daily practice: a study on adherence and patients' experiences.

Authors:  Lonneke Timmers; Eleonora L Swart; Christel Clm Boons; Dirk Mangnus; Peter M van de Ven; Godefridus J Peters; Epie Boven; Jacqueline G Hugtenburg
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.