Literature DB >> 17036357

Long-term safety of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging performed in the first few days after bare-metal stent implantation.

Mushabbar A Syed1, Karen Carlson, Mandy Murphy, W Patricia Ingkanisorn, Kenneth L Rhoads, Andrew E Arai.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the long-term safety of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) performed one to seven days after coronary artery stent (bare metal) implantation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 119 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) who underwent emergency coronary stent implantation with a bare-metal stent. CMR using a 1.5T scanner was performed on 51 patients (42.9%) at a mean of 2.7+/-3.1 days after stent implantation (CMR+ group), and the remaining 68 patients (57.1%) served as controls (CMR- group). The patients were followed up to six months for major adverse cardiac events.
RESULTS: The average stent size was 3.3+/-0.5x18.4+/-6.7 mm, and 86% of the stents were made of 316L stainless steel. There were no significant differences between the CMR+ and CMR- groups in terms of infarct features, angiographic findings, or stent characteristics. Over a mean follow-up of 4.4+/-2.1 months, 12 patients (10.1%) had 16 events (13.4%). Two patients had adverse events after early MRI scan (4.3%), a rate that is lower than the event rate in the patients who did not undergo MRI (16%, P=0.04), and one of the two events was clearly not MRI related.
CONCLUSION: CMR on a 1.5T scanner can be safely performed within one to seven days after coronary bare-metal stent implantation and is not associated with an increased risk of adverse clinical cardiac outcomes. In the light of accumulating data, the guidelines by stent manufacturers should be revised. Copyright (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17036357     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  10 in total

1.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the hyperacute phase of ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Eric Larose; Julie Côté; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Bernard Noël; Gerald Barbeau; Edith Bordeleau; Santiago Miró; Bernard Brochu; Robert Delarochellière; Olivier F Bertrand
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging safety following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jason W Curtis; Donna C Lesniak; James H Wible; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  MRI in patients with cardiac devices.

Authors:  Edward T Martin; David A Sandler
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Clinical safety of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T early after stent placement for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jérôme Jehl; Alexandre Comte; Sébastien Aubry; Nicolas Meneveau; François Schiele; Bruno Kastler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Assessment of cardiac ischaemia and viability: role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Juerg Schwitter; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  CMR in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Daniel M Sado; Jonathan M Hasleton; Anna S Herrey; James C Moon
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 1.866

9.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in primary PCI: additional value?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J J Bax; J W Jukema; M J Schalij
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  3.0 T cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients treated with coronary stenting for myocardial infarction: evaluation of short term safety and image quality.

Authors:  Robin Nijveldt; Alexander Hirsch; Mark B M Hofman; Aernout M Beek; Anje M Spijkerboer; Jan J Piek; Albert C van Rossum
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 2.357

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.