Susan R McGurk1, Kim T Mueser. 1. New Hampshire-Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center, Concord 03301, and Department of Psychiatry, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA. susan.r.mcgurk@dartmouth.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the strategies used by employment specialists to help clients in supported employment programs manage cognitive impairments that interfered with obtaining and keeping jobs. METHODS: Twenty-five supported employment specialists were surveyed to identify strategies they used to help their clients cope with cognitive problems in the domains of attention, psychomotor speed, memory, and problem solving. Then, 50 employment specialists were surveyed to determine whether they used each of the different coping strategies generated in the first part of the study. For each strategy used, they rated how effective it was. RESULTS: Employment specialists reported using a total of 76 different strategies for helping their clients cope with cognitive difficulties. The specialists reported using an average of 48 different coping strategies, which they rated on average as just below effective. Strategies for dealing with attention problems were rated as more effective than strategies used in the other three domains. The number of coping strategies that they reported using was significantly correlated with the perceived effectiveness of the strategies and the proportion of clients in their caseload who were working. CONCLUSIONS: Supported employment specialists were actively involved in helping clients cope with their cognitive impairments. Use of more strategies was correlated with specialists' greater perceived effectiveness of the strategies and with higher rates of working clients on their caseloads, although the reasons for these associations are unclear. Further research is needed to evaluate whether employment specialists' use of more strategies to help clients cope with cognitive problems contributes to better work outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the strategies used by employment specialists to help clients in supported employment programs manage cognitive impairments that interfered with obtaining and keeping jobs. METHODS: Twenty-five supported employment specialists were surveyed to identify strategies they used to help their clients cope with cognitive problems in the domains of attention, psychomotor speed, memory, and problem solving. Then, 50 employment specialists were surveyed to determine whether they used each of the different coping strategies generated in the first part of the study. For each strategy used, they rated how effective it was. RESULTS: Employment specialists reported using a total of 76 different strategies for helping their clients cope with cognitive difficulties. The specialists reported using an average of 48 different coping strategies, which they rated on average as just below effective. Strategies for dealing with attention problems were rated as more effective than strategies used in the other three domains. The number of coping strategies that they reported using was significantly correlated with the perceived effectiveness of the strategies and the proportion of clients in their caseload who were working. CONCLUSIONS: Supported employment specialists were actively involved in helping clients cope with their cognitive impairments. Use of more strategies was correlated with specialists' greater perceived effectiveness of the strategies and with higher rates of working clients on their caseloads, although the reasons for these associations are unclear. Further research is needed to evaluate whether employment specialists' use of more strategies to help clients cope with cognitive problems contributes to better work outcomes.
Authors: Kelly Allott; Kristi van-der-El; Shayden Bryce; Emma M Parrish; Susan R McGurk; Sarah Hetrick; Christopher R Bowie; Sean Kidd; Matthew Hamilton; Eoin Killackey; Dawn Velligan Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: David L Penn; Richard S E Keefe; Sonia M Davis; Piper S Meyer; Diana O Perkins; Diane Losardo; Jeffrey A Lieberman Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2009-09-18 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Steven M Silverstein; William D Spaulding; Anthony A Menditto; Adam Savitz; Robert P Liberman; Sarah Berten; Hannah Starobin Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2008-01-22 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Sarah E Lord; Susan R McGurk; Joanne Nicholson; Elizabeth A Carpenter-Song; Justin S Tauscher; Deborah R Becker; Sarah J Swanson; Robert E Drake; Gary R Bond Journal: Psychiatr Rehabil J Date: 2014-06