Marc Corbière1, Sara Zaniboni, Tania Lecomte, Gary Bond, Pierre-Yves Gilles, Alain Lesage, Elliot Goldner. 1. School of Rehabilitation, Centre for Action in Work Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke (campus de Longueuil), École de Réadaptation, CAPRIT, 1111, St Charles Ouest #101, Longueuil, QC J4K 5G4, Canada. marc.corbiere@usherbrooke.ca
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The main purpose of this study was to test a conceptual model based on the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) to explain competitive job acquisition of people with severe mental disorders enrolled in supported employment programs. METHODS: Using a sample of 281 people with severe mental disorders participating in a prospective study design, the authors examined the contribution of the TPB in a model including clinical (e.g., severity of symptoms), psychosocial (e.g., self-esteem) and work related variables (e.g., length of time absent from the workplace) as predictors of job acquisition. Path analyses were used to test two conceptual models: (1) the model of job acquisition for people with mental illness adapted from the TPB, and (2) the extended TPB including clinical, psychosocial, and work related variables recognized in the literature as significant determinants of competitive employment. RESULTS: Findings revealed that both models presented good fit indices. In total, individual factors predicted 26% of the variance in job search behaviours (behavioural actions). However, client characteristics explained only 8% of variance in work outcomes, suggesting that environmental variables (e.g., stigma towards mental disorders) play an important role in predicting job acquisition. About 56% (N = 157) of our sample obtained competitive employment. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that employment specialists can be guided in their interventions by the concepts found in the extended model of work integration since most of these are modifiable, such as perceived barriers to employment, self-efficacy, and self-esteem.
INTRODUCTION: The main purpose of this study was to test a conceptual model based on the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) to explain competitive job acquisition of people with severe mental disorders enrolled in supported employment programs. METHODS: Using a sample of 281 people with severe mental disorders participating in a prospective study design, the authors examined the contribution of the TPB in a model including clinical (e.g., severity of symptoms), psychosocial (e.g., self-esteem) and work related variables (e.g., length of time absent from the workplace) as predictors of job acquisition. Path analyses were used to test two conceptual models: (1) the model of job acquisition for people with mental illness adapted from the TPB, and (2) the extended TPB including clinical, psychosocial, and work related variables recognized in the literature as significant determinants of competitive employment. RESULTS: Findings revealed that both models presented good fit indices. In total, individual factors predicted 26% of the variance in job search behaviours (behavioural actions). However, client characteristics explained only 8% of variance in work outcomes, suggesting that environmental variables (e.g., stigma towards mental disorders) play an important role in predicting job acquisition. About 56% (N = 157) of our sample obtained competitive employment. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that employment specialists can be guided in their interventions by the concepts found in the extended model of work integration since most of these are modifiable, such as perceived barriers to employment, self-efficacy, and self-esteem.
Authors: Marc Corbière; Nathalie Lanctôt; Tania Lecomte; Eric Latimer; Paula Goering; Bonnie Kirsh; Elliot M Goldner; Daniel Reinharz; Matthew Menear; Jane Mizevich; Tanya Kamagiannis Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2009-06-18
Authors: Matthew J Smith; Michael F Fleming; Michael A Wright; Andrea G Roberts; Laura Boteler Humm; Dale Olsen; Morris D Bell Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2015-05-29 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Matthew J Smith; Justin D Smith; Michael F Fleming; Neil Jordan; C Hendricks Brown; Laura Humm; Dale Olsen; Morris D Bell Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 3.084