BACKGROUND: Cohort studies suggest that higher circulating carotenoid concentrations through food sources may reduce breast cancer events. Other intervention studies have not achieved the level of change in circulating carotenoids required to properly test this hypothesis. METHODS: In a randomized trial of 2,922 breast cancer survivors, we examined blood and self-reported diet at baseline and 1 year. Intensive telephone counseling encouraged a plant-based diet in the intervention group. Diet was measured via 24-hour recalls, and a panel of plasma carotenoid concentrations was assessed at both time points. RESULTS: The study intervention was associated with a 51% increase in total carotenoid concentration, from 2.272 +/- 1.294 to 3.440 +/- 2.320 micromol/L, achieved mainly by marked increases in targeted carotenoids: alpha-carotene, beta-carotene, and lutein. For each of these targeted carotenoids, the proportion of the intervention sample remaining below the cutpoint for the lowest baseline quartile decreased by one third to one half. After 1 year of study, half of the intervention group was in the highest baseline quartile. No change in distribution was observed in comparison group. Intervention participants achieved this change by both dietary pattern and vegetable juice consumption. Participants who chose to change dietary pattern without consuming significant quantities of vegetable juice achieved 75% of the level of change observed in other intervention participants. CONCLUSIONS:Innovative telephone counseling intervention and dietary targets in the Women's Healthy Eating and Living study were associated with the level of change in circulating carotenoid concentration necessary to test the diet and breast cancer hypothesis suggested by cohort studies.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Cohort studies suggest that higher circulating carotenoid concentrations through food sources may reduce breast cancer events. Other intervention studies have not achieved the level of change in circulating carotenoids required to properly test this hypothesis. METHODS: In a randomized trial of 2,922 breast cancer survivors, we examined blood and self-reported diet at baseline and 1 year. Intensive telephone counseling encouraged a plant-based diet in the intervention group. Diet was measured via 24-hour recalls, and a panel of plasma carotenoid concentrations was assessed at both time points. RESULTS: The study intervention was associated with a 51% increase in total carotenoid concentration, from 2.272 +/- 1.294 to 3.440 +/- 2.320 micromol/L, achieved mainly by marked increases in targeted carotenoids: alpha-carotene, beta-carotene, and lutein. For each of these targeted carotenoids, the proportion of the intervention sample remaining below the cutpoint for the lowest baseline quartile decreased by one third to one half. After 1 year of study, half of the intervention group was in the highest baseline quartile. No change in distribution was observed in comparison group. Intervention participants achieved this change by both dietary pattern and vegetable juice consumption. Participants who chose to change dietary pattern without consuming significant quantities of vegetable juice achieved 75% of the level of change observed in other intervention participants. CONCLUSIONS: Innovative telephone counseling intervention and dietary targets in the Women's Healthy Eating and Living study were associated with the level of change in circulating carotenoid concentration necessary to test the diet and breast cancer hypothesis suggested by cohort studies.
Authors: Loki Natarajan; Minya Pu; Juanjuan Fan; Richard A Levine; Ruth E Patterson; Cynthia A Thomson; Cheryl L Rock; John P Pierce Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-08-18 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: A Heather Eliassen; Xiaomei Liao; Bernard Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi; Shelley S Tworoger; Susan E Hankinson Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Lee Hooper; Carolyn D Summerbell; Rachel Thompson; Deirdre Sills; Felicia G Roberts; Helen J Moore; George Davey Smith Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2012-05-16
Authors: Raheem J Paxton; Celia Garcia-Prieto; Maria Berglund; Mike Hernandez; Richard A Hajek; Beverly Handy; Jubilee Brown; Lovell A Jones Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Fayth L Miles; Jan Irene C Lloren; Ella Haddad; Karen Jaceldo-Siegl; Synnove Knutsen; Joan Sabate; Gary E Fraser Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Ellen B Gold; John P Pierce; Loki Natarajan; Marcia L Stefanick; Gail A Laughlin; Bette J Caan; Shirley W Flatt; Jennifer A Emond; Nazmus Saquib; Lisa Madlensky; Sheila Kealey; Linda Wasserman; Cynthia A Thomson; Cheryl L Rock; Barbara A Parker; Njeri Karanja; Vicky Jones; Richard A Hajek; Minya Pu; Joanne E Mortimer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joseph A Hyder; Cynthia A Thomson; Loki Natarajan; Lisa Madlensky; Minya Pu; Jennifer Emond; Sheila Kealey; Cheryl L Rock; Shirley W Flatt; John P Pierce Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2009 Sep-Oct
Authors: Nazmus Saquib; Cheryl L Rock; Loki Natarajan; Shirley W Flatt; Vicky A Newman; Cynthia A Thomson; Bette J Caan; John P Pierce Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2009-01-30
Authors: Lisa Madlensky; Loki Natarajan; Shirley W Flatt; Susan Faerber; Vicky A Newman; John P Pierce Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Nazmus Saquib; Loki Natarajan; Cheryl L Rock; Shirley W Flatt; Lisa Madlensky; Sheila Kealey; John P Pierce Journal: Nutr Cancer Date: 2008 Impact factor: 2.900