Maria T Chao1, Christine Wade, Fredi Kronenberg, Debra Kalmuss, Linda F Cushman. 1. The Richard and Hinda Rosenthal Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, College Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. mtc28@columbia.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Although racial/ethnic differences in the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) utilization have been documented, differences in the reasons for using CAM have not been empirically assessed. In an increasingly diverse society, understanding differences in rates of and reasons for CAM use could elucidate cultural and social factors of health behaviors and inform health care improvements. The current study examines reasons for CAM use among women in four racial/ethnic groups. DESIGN: A national telephone survey of 3172 women aged 18 years and older was conducted in four languages. Respondents were asked about their use of remedies or treatments not typically prescribed by a medical doctor. This study focuses on those women who used CAM in the previous year and their reasons for using CAM. RESULTS: Non-Hispanic white women were most likely to cite personal beliefs for CAM use. Cost of conventional medicine was most prevalent among Mexican-American women CAM users. Physician referral, family and friends, and media sources were all equally likely to lead to CAM use in non-Hispanic white women. In contrast, informal networks of family and friends were the most important social influences of CAM use among African-, Mexican-, and Chinese-American women. CONCLUSIONS: Racial/ethnic differences in reasons for CAM use highlight cultural and social factors that are important to consider in public evaluation of the risks and benefits of CAM remedies and treatments.
OBJECTIVES: Although racial/ethnic differences in the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) utilization have been documented, differences in the reasons for using CAM have not been empirically assessed. In an increasingly diverse society, understanding differences in rates of and reasons for CAM use could elucidate cultural and social factors of health behaviors and inform health care improvements. The current study examines reasons for CAM use among women in four racial/ethnic groups. DESIGN: A national telephone survey of 3172 women aged 18 years and older was conducted in four languages. Respondents were asked about their use of remedies or treatments not typically prescribed by a medical doctor. This study focuses on those women who used CAM in the previous year and their reasons for using CAM. RESULTS: Non-Hispanic white women were most likely to cite personal beliefs for CAM use. Cost of conventional medicine was most prevalent among Mexican-American women CAM users. Physician referral, family and friends, and media sources were all equally likely to lead to CAM use in non-Hispanic white women. In contrast, informal networks of family and friends were the most important social influences of CAM use among African-, Mexican-, and Chinese-American women. CONCLUSIONS: Racial/ethnic differences in reasons for CAM use highlight cultural and social factors that are important to consider in public evaluation of the risks and benefits of CAM remedies and treatments.
Authors: Robert E Graham; Andrew C Ahn; Roger B Davis; Bonnie B O'Connor; David M Eisenberg; Russell S Phillips Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 1.798
Authors: Fredi Kronenberg; Linda F Cushman; Christine M Wade; Debra Kalmuss; Maria T Chao Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: R C Kessler; R B Davis; D F Foster; M I Van Rompay; E E Walters; S A Wilkey; T J Kaptchuk; D M Eisenberg Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2001-08-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Ellen Silver Highfield; Lisa Spellman; Linda L Barnes; Ted J Kaptchuk; Gabrielle Paradis; Lisa Ann Conboy; Robert Saper Journal: Complement Ther Med Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 2.446
Authors: Kristen Arthur; Juan Carlos Belliard; Steven B Hardin; Kathryn Knecht; Chien-Shing Chen; Susanne Montgomery Journal: Integr Cancer Ther Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 3.279
Authors: Carlos J Rodriguez; Matthew Allison; Martha L Daviglus; Carmen R Isasi; Colleen Keller; Enrique C Leira; Latha Palaniappan; Ileana L Piña; Sarah M Ramirez; Beatriz Rodriguez; Mario Sims Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-07-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Marian Reiff; Christine Wade; Maria T Chao; Fredi Kronenberg; Linda F Cushman Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 2.681