Literature DB >> 12220087

An investigation of the health beliefs and motivations of complementary medicine clients.

Fuschia M Sirois1, Mary L Gick.   

Abstract

The current study was concerned with factors associated with the use of complementary medicine (CM). The reasons for CM use were examined by dividing complementary medicine clients into two groups based on the frequency and length of their use of complementary therapies, and comparing them with conventional medicine clients as well as to each other. New/infrequent CM clients (n = 70), established CM clients (n = 71), and orthodox medicine clients (n = 58) were distinguished on the basis of health beliefs, socio-demographic, medical, and personality variables. Different patterns of predictors of CM use emerged depending on which client groups were compared. In general, health-aware behaviors and dissatisfaction with conventional medicine were the best predictors of overall and initial/ infrequent CM use, and more frequent health-aware behaviors were associated with continued CM use. Medical need also influenced the choice to use CM, and was the best predictor of committed CM use, with the established CM clients reporting more health problems than the new/infrequent CM group. Overall, income was a significant discriminator, but did not predict initial or continued CM use. Openness to new experience was associated with CM use in general, but was most notable in the decision to initially try or explore using CM. The findings support the utility of the three components (predisposing, enabling, and need factors) of the socio-behavioral model for explaining why some people choose CM. Overall, the results of the current study suggest that CM clients need to be looked at in more sophisticated ways, rather than being treated simply as a homogenous group with similar beliefs, motivations and needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12220087     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00229-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  66 in total

1.  A survey investigating the associations between self-management practices and quality of life in cancer survivors.

Authors:  C Shneerson; T Taskila; S Greenfield; N Gale
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Beliefs and perceptions of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer who refused conventional treatment in favor of alternative therapies.

Authors:  Dennis L Citrin; Diane L Bloom; James F Grutsch; Sara J Mortensen; Christopher G Lis
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-04-24

3.  Complementary and alternative medicine use as health self-management: rural older adults with diabetes.

Authors:  Thomas A Arcury; Ronny A Bell; Beverly M Snively; Shannon L Smith; Anne H Skelly; Lindsay K Wetmore; Sara A Quandt
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 4.  Complementary and alternative medicine and coping in neuroimmunological diseases.

Authors:  A Apel; B Greim; U K Zettl
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine influence its use.

Authors:  Kristina L McFadden; Theresa D Hernández; Tiffany A Ito
Journal:  Explore (NY)       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.775

6.  Neuropsychiatric symptoms and the use of complementary and alternative medicine.

Authors:  Maulik P Purohit; Rebecca Erwin Wells; Ross D Zafonte; Roger B Davis; Russell S Phillips
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.298

7.  Implicit Reasons for Disclosure of the Use of Complementary Health Approaches (CHA): a Consumer Commitment Perspective.

Authors:  Fuschia M Sirois; Helene Riess; Dawn M Upchurch
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2017-10

8.  Determinants of public trust in complementary and alternative medicine.

Authors:  Evelien van der Schee; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Differences in the quality of interpersonal care in complementary and conventional medicine.

Authors:  André Busato; Beat Künzi
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.659

Review 10.  How parents choose to use CAM: a systematic review of theoretical models.

Authors:  Ava Lorenc; Yael Ilan-Clarke; Nicola Robinson; Mitch Blair
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.659

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.