Literature DB >> 11905521

Evaluation of the age-adjusted incidence of hip fractures between urban and rural areas: the difference is not related to the prevalence of institutions for the elderly.

T Chevalley1, F R Herrmann, M Delmi, R Stern, P Hoffmeyer, C H Rapin, R Rizzoli.   

Abstract

As many as 40% of hip fractures occur in institutions for the elderly. Several studies have demonstrated a higher age-adjusted incidence of hip fractures in urban areas compared with rural areas. To assess whether this difference could be due to a preferential location of institutions for the elderly in urban areas, we compared the incidence of hip fractures over a 5-year period in urban versus rural areas, as defined according to the population density (urban > 15 inhabitants/ha2). We then determined the age-adjusted incidence of hip fractures in institutional-dwelling elderly and home-dwelling elderly. Hip fracture incidence was 100.0/100,000 (150.5 in women and 43.8 in men) in urban areas, and 71.0/100,000 (107.2 in women and 32.8 in men) in rural areas (p<0.001). When only those patients living in their own homes were analyzed, the incidence was 66.7/100000 (94.6 in women and 35.7 in men) in urban regions and 36.8/100,000 (49.6 in women and 23.4 in men) in rural areas (p<0.001), a difference of even greater magnitude than when both home-dwelling and institutional-dwelling residents were considered together. In a logistic regression model including age class, gender, urban or rural areas and institutionalization for inhabitants 65 years of age and older, urban residents have a 31% significantly (p<0.001) higher incidence of hip fracture compared with rural residents; women have a 79% significantly (p<0.001) higher incidence of hip fracture compared with men; and institutional-dwelling elderly have a 351% significantly (p<0.001) higher incidence of hip fracture compared with home-dwelling elderly. These results confirm the existence of a higher age-adjusted incidence of hip fractures in urban compared with rural areas. Since this difference is increased when patients living at home were analyzed separately, it indicates that the difference between urban and rural areas is not due to a preferential urban location of institutions for the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11905521     DOI: 10.1007/s001980200002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  32 in total

1.  Acute traumatic injuries in rural populations.

Authors:  Corinne Peek-Asa; Craig Zwerling; Lorann Stallones
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Incidence and cost of osteoporotic fractures in France during 2001. A methodological approach by the national hospital database.

Authors:  Milka Maravic; Christine Le Bihan; Paul Landais; Patrice Fardellone
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Socioeconomic and living conditions are determinants of hip fracture incidence and age occurrence among community-dwelling elderly.

Authors:  E Guilley; F Herrmann; C-H Rapin; P Hoffmeyer; R Rizzoli; T Chevalley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Geographic trends in incidence of hip fractures: a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  S Y Cheng; A R Levy; K A Lefaivre; P Guy; L Kuramoto; B Sobolev
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The interactions between municipal socioeconomic status and age on hip fracture risk.

Authors:  C M Oliveira; T Economou; T Bailey; D Mendonça; M F Pina
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The role of socioeconomic status on hip fracture.

Authors:  D S Zingmond; N F Soohoo; S L Silverman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Epidemiology of hip fracture in Tucuman, Argentina.

Authors:  A Wittich; A Bagur; C Mautalen; A Cristofari; O Escobar; G Carrizo; B Oliveri
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Undertreatment of osteoporosis in the oldest old? A nationwide study of over 700,000 older people.

Authors:  Kristina Johnell; Johan Fastbom
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  Bone mineral density and incidence of hip fracture in Swedish urban and rural women 1987-2002.

Authors:  Björn E Rosengren; Henrik G Ahlborg; Per Gärdsell; Ingemar Sernbo; Robin M Daly; Jan-Ake Nilsson; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Hip fractures cluster in space: an epidemiological analysis in Portugal.

Authors:  M F de Pina; S M Alves; M Barbosa; H Barros
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.