Literature DB >> 17032896

The University of Rochester model of breast cancer detection and survival.

Leonid G Hanin1, Anthony Miller, A V Zorin, Andrei Y Yakovlev.   

Abstract

This paper presents a biologically motivated model of breast cancer development and detection allowing for arbitrary screening schedules and the effects of clinical covariates recorded at the time of diagnosis on posttreatment survival. Biologically meaningful parameters of the model are estimated by the method of maximum likelihood from the data on age and tumor size at detection that resulted from two randomized trials known as the Canadian National Breast Screening Studies. When properly calibrated, the model provides a good description of the U.S. national trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality. The model was validated by predicting some quantitative characteristics obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data. In particular, the model provides an excellent prediction of the size-specific age-adjusted incidence of invasive breast cancer as a function of calendar time for 1975-1999. Predictive properties of the model are also illustrated with an application to the dynamics of age-specific incidence and stage-specific age-adjusted incidence over 1975-1999.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17032896     DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgj010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  6 in total

Review 1.  Calibration methods used in cancer simulation models and suggested reporting guidelines.

Authors:  Natasha K Stout; Amy B Knudsen; Chung Yin Kong; Pamela M McMahon; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Modelling population-based cancer survival trends using join point models for grouped survival data.

Authors:  Binbing Yu; Lan Huang; Ram C Tiwari; Eric J Feuer; Karen A Johnson
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.483

3.  Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: A Computational Risk Analysis.

Authors:  Marc D Ryser; Mathias Worni; Elizabeth L Turner; Jeffrey R Marks; Rick Durrett; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Identifiability of the joint distribution of age and tumor size at detection in the presence of screening.

Authors:  Leonid Hanin; Andrei Yakovlev
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 2.144

5.  Social network effects of nonlifesaving early-stage breast cancer detection on mammography rates.

Authors:  Sarah A Nowak; Andrew M Parker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Second cancers after fractionated radiotherapy: stochastic population dynamics effects.

Authors:  Rainer K Sachs; Igor Shuryak; David Brenner; Hatim Fakir; Lynn Hlatky; Philip Hahnfeldt
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-08-12       Impact factor: 2.691

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.