Literature DB >> 17032102

Temporary anchorage devices for tooth movement: a review and case reports.

Michael K McGuire1, E Todd Scheyer, Ronald L Gallerano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) are immediately loaded miniscrews and osseointegrated palatal implants that are placed to control tooth movement during orthodontic treatment and removed when the treatment is completed. They are a relatively new addition to the dental armamentarium and can be used in some cases to replace traditional orthodontic extraoral appliances. Because placement requires a surgical procedure, orthodontists often refer patients to periodontists for this stage of the overall treatment plan.
METHODS: The purpose of this article is to introduce TADs to the periodontal community by reviewing their purpose, various systems that are available, indications for use, site selection, and surgical technique. Case reports are included to illustrate this new treatment approach.
RESULTS: Placement of osseointegrated implants for restorative purposes is an established procedure in most periodontal offices. Although placement of TADs is a modification of these familiar techniques, most of these devices serve a very different purpose, involving new loading protocols with no expectation of osseointegration in patients usually not receiving concomitant periodontal therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Periodontists' knowledge of soft and hard tissue anatomy and their ability to manage soft tissue position them well to collaborate with orthodontists in this multidisciplinary treatment. However, as with every new modality, clinicians need to understand the specific uses and limitations of TADs and work closely with their referring orthodontists in identifying patients for whom miniscrew implants are a viable option. Periodontal practices are based primarily on referrals from dental colleagues, and the concept of periodontists working cooperatively with orthodontists is not new. Including TAD placement among the services periodontists offer provides another opportunity to further this relationship and to establish periodontists as appropriate resources for this segment of orthodontic treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17032102     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2006.060127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  6 in total

1.  "Safe zones" for miniscrew implant placement in different dentoskeletal patterns.

Authors:  Pajongjit Chaimanee; Boonsiva Suzuki; Eduardo Yugo Suzuki
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Influence of interradicular and palatal placement of orthodontic mini-implants on the success (survival) rate.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Dirk Bister; Georgios Kanavakis; Jörg Alexander Lisson; Björn Ludwig
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.151

3.  Dynamics, Efficacies, and Adverse Effects of Maxillary Full-Arch Intrusion Using Temporary Anchorage Devices (Miniscrews): A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Marzieh Mazhari; Mashallah Khanehmasjedi; Mohsen Mazhary; Nastaran Atashkar; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.246

4.  Effect of surface treatment on the mechanical stability of orthodontic miniscrews.

Authors:  Yousef Al-Thomali; Sakeenabi Basha; Roshan Noor Mohamed
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Evaluation of mini-implant sites in the posterior maxilla using traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Mona A Abbassy; Hanady M Sabban; Ali H Hassan; Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.484

6.  Temporary Anchorage Device: An Epitome of Anchorage in Orthodontic Treatment.

Authors:  Preeth Shetty; Us Krishna Nayak; Amitha M Hegde; Mary Jacob
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2010-04-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.