Literature DB >> 17031797

Statistics for proteomics: a review of tools for analyzing experimental data.

Wolfgang Urfer1, Marco Grzegorczyk, Klaus Jung.   

Abstract

Most proteomics experiments make use of 'high throughput' technologies such as 2-DE, MS or protein arrays to measure simultaneously the expression levels of thousands of proteins. Such experiments yield large, high-dimensional data sets which usually reflect not only the biological but also technical and experimental factors. Statistical tools are essential for evaluating these data and preventing false conclusions. Here, an overview is given of some typical statistical tools for proteomics experiments. In particular, we present methods for data preprocessing (e.g. calibration, missing values estimation and outlier detection), comparison of protein expression in different groups (e.g. detection of differentially expressed proteins or classification of new observations) as well as the detection of dependencies between proteins (e.g. protein clusters or networks). We also discuss questions of sample size planning for some of these methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17031797     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200600554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  10 in total

Review 1.  Finding biomarkers is getting easier.

Authors:  Brian Patrick Bradley
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  Protein abundance ratios for global studies of prokaryotes.

Authors:  Qiangwei Xia; Erik L Hendrickson; Tiansong Wang; Richard J Lamont; John A Leigh; Murray Hackett
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 3.  Image analysis tools and emerging algorithms for expression proteomics.

Authors:  Andrew W Dowsey; Jane A English; Frederique Lisacek; Jeffrey S Morris; Guang-Zhong Yang; Michael J Dunn
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Detecting Significant Changes in Protein Abundance.

Authors:  Kai Kammers; Robert N Cole; Calvin Tiengwe; Ingo Ruczinski
Journal:  EuPA Open Proteom       Date:  2015-06

5.  Statistical inference from multiple iTRAQ experiments without using common reference standards.

Authors:  Shelley M Herbrich; Robert N Cole; Keith P West; Kerry Schulze; James D Yager; John D Groopman; Parul Christian; Lee Wu; Robert N O'Meally; Damon H May; Martin W McIntosh; Ingo Ruczinski
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  A Tailored Multivariate Mixture Model for Detecting Proteins of Concordant Change Among Virulent Strains of Clostridium Perfringens.

Authors:  Kun Chen; Neha Mishra; Joan Smyth; Haim Bar; Elizabeth Schifano; Lynn Kuo; Ming-Hui Chen
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Proteomic Profiling of the Dystrophin-Deficient MDX Heart Reveals Drastically Altered Levels of Key Metabolic and Contractile Proteins.

Authors:  Caroline Lewis; Harald Jockusch; Kay Ohlendieck
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-05-23

8.  Identification of early intestinal neoplasia protein biomarkers using laser capture microdissection and MALDI MS.

Authors:  Baogang J Xu; Jiaqing Li; R Daniel Beauchamp; Yu Shyr; Ming Li; M Kay Washington; Timothy J Yeatman; Robert H Whitehead; Robert J Coffey; Richard M Caprioli
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Posttranslational modifications of proteins are key features in the identification of CSF biomarkers of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Ivan L Salazar; Ana S T Lourenço; Bruno Manadas; Inês Baldeiras; Cláudia Ferreira; Anabela Claro Teixeira; Vera M Mendes; Ana Margarida Novo; Rita Machado; Sónia Batista; Maria do Carmo Macário; Mário Grãos; Lívia Sousa; Maria João Saraiva; Alberto A C C Pais; Carlos B Duarte
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 8.322

10.  Proteomic analysis of peach fruit mesocarp softening and chilling injury using difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE).

Authors:  Ricardo Nilo; Carlos Saffie; Kathryn Lilley; Ricardo Baeza-Yates; Verónica Cambiazo; Reinaldo Campos-Vargas; Mauricio González; Lee A Meisel; Julio Retamales; Herman Silva; Ariel Orellana
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.969

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.