Literature DB >> 17031539

Leadlikeness and structural diversity of synthetic screening libraries.

Herman J Verheij1.   

Abstract

High program failure rates in the pharmaceutical industry have prompted the development of predictive software that can profile compound libraries as being 'druglike' (resembling existing drugs) and/or 'leadlike' (possessing the structural and physicochemical profile of a quality lead). In recent years, these two notions prompted pharmaceutical companies to clean up their corporate libraries of screening compounds. In order to maintain and expand the size and diversity of these corporate libraries, pharmaceutical companies still continue to add compounds to these, mainly by the acquisition of screening libraries. In this paper, we have analyzed 45 commercially available libraries, offered by suppliers of screening chemistry, for leadlikeness and diversity of the offered structures. To this end we have used a set of structural and physicochemical filters for leadlikeness that was developed in-house. These 45 supplier libraries contained a total of 5.3 million structures, of which 49% (2,592,778 structures) turned out to be unique, and only 12% (677,328 structures) were found to be both unique and leadlike. A diversity analysis revealed that big differences exist between the various offered libraries.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17031539     DOI: 10.1007/s11030-006-9040-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Divers        ISSN: 1381-1991            Impact factor:   2.943


  27 in total

1.  CheD: chemical database compilation tool, Internet server, and client for SQL servers.

Authors:  S V Trepalin; A V Yarkov
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

2.  Chemical information management in drug discovery: optimizing the computational and combinatorial chemistry interfaces.

Authors:  T I Oprea; J Gottfries; V Sherbukhin; P Svensson; T C Kühler
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2000 Aug-Oct       Impact factor: 2.518

3.  Drug-like index: a new approach to measure drug-like compounds and their diversity.

Authors:  J Xu; J Stevenson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

4.  Development of a virtual screening method for identification of "frequent hitters" in compound libraries.

Authors:  Olivier Roche; Petra Schneider; Jochen Zuegge; Wolfgang Guba; Manfred Kansy; Alexander Alanine; Konrad Bleicher; Franck Danel; Eva-Maria Gutknecht; Mark Rogers-Evans; Werner Neidhart; Henri Stalder; Michael Dillon; Eric Sjögren; Nader Fotouhi; Paul Gillespie; Robert Goodnow; William Harris; Phil Jones; Mikio Taniguchi; Shinji Tsujii; Wolfgang von der Saal; Gerd Zimmermann; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  A common mechanism underlying promiscuous inhibitors from virtual and high-throughput screening.

Authors:  Susan L McGovern; Emilia Caselli; Nikolaus Grigorieff; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  A new approach to finding natural chemical structure classes.

Authors:  Jun Xu
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  A structure-permeability study of small drug-like molecules.

Authors:  Thomas Fichert; Mehran Yazdanian; John R Proudfoot
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2003-02-24       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Examination of the computed molecular properties of compounds selected for clinical development.

Authors:  James F Blake
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.993

9.  A 'rule of three' for fragment-based lead discovery?

Authors:  Miles Congreve; Robin Carr; Chris Murray; Harren Jhoti
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 7.851

10.  Lead- and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution.

Authors:  Christopher A Lipinski
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Technol       Date:  2004-12
View more
  10 in total

1.  Interactive exploration of chemical space with Scaffold Hunter.

Authors:  Stefan Wetzel; Karsten Klein; Steffen Renner; Daniel Rauh; Tudor I Oprea; Petra Mutzel; Herbert Waldmann
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 15.040

2.  Compound Management for Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.

Authors:  Adam Yasgar; Paul Shinn; Ajit Jadhav; Douglas Auld; Sam Michael; Wei Zheng; Christopher P Austin; James Inglese; Anton Simeonov
Journal:  JALA Charlottesv Va       Date:  2008-04

Review 3.  Rational methods for the selection of diverse screening compounds.

Authors:  David J Huggins; Ashok R Venkitaraman; David R Spring
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 5.100

4.  A two-step target binding and selectivity support vector machines approach for virtual screening of dopamine receptor subtype-selective ligands.

Authors:  Jingxian Zhang; Bucong Han; Xiaona Wei; Chunyan Tan; Yuzong Chen; Yuyang Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Generative Recurrent Networks for De Novo Drug Design.

Authors:  Anvita Gupta; Alex T Müller; Berend J H Huisman; Jens A Fuchs; Petra Schneider; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Mol Inform       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.353

6.  Deep learning and virtual drug screening.

Authors:  Kristy A Carpenter; David S Cohen; Juliet T Jarrell; Xudong Huang
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.808

Review 7.  Machine Learning-based Virtual Screening and Its Applications to Alzheimer's Drug Discovery: A Review.

Authors:  Kristy A Carpenter; Xudong Huang
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.116

8.  Sea Cucumber Compounds Targeting NF-κB in Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Teresa Liliana Wargasetia; Hana Ratnawati; Nashi Widodo
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2022-04-17

Review 9.  Can Invalid Bioactives Undermine Natural Product-Based Drug Discovery?

Authors:  Jonathan Bisson; James B McAlpine; J Brent Friesen; Shao-Nong Chen; James Graham; Guido F Pauli
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 10.  Key Topics in Molecular Docking for Drug Design.

Authors:  Pedro H M Torres; Ana C R Sodero; Paula Jofily; Floriano P Silva-Jr
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.