AIM: To examine general practitioner (GP) and patient recruitment in a randomised clinical trial to determine the usefulness of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in the diagnosis of heart failure in the community. METHODS: Different techniques were used to maximise GP recruitment including early consultation with GPs, benefits for participating GPs and patients, and a comprehensive suburb-by-suburb approach to GPs using letters and personal visits. GPs then referred patients. At the conclusion of the study, GPs were given a questionnaire focussing on barriers to referral and reasons for participation. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty seven GPs from 135 practices were sent an introductory letter; 294 were eligible to participate. Of these, 186 GPs (63% of eligible GPs) agreed to participate. Ninety two GPs (31% of eligible GPs) from 62 practices referred 307 patients to the study (range 1-14 patients). There were no significant differences between referring and non-referring GPs with respect to sociodemographic characteristics. Referring GPs were very supportive of GP participation in research and strongly agreed that GPs should be reimbursed for involvement in trials. CONCLUSIONS: Patient recruitment by GPs may be aided by the use of a range of strategies including financial reimbursement. GPs who agree to participate will not always recruit patients. Closer collaboration and understanding between primary healthcare professionals and researchers may further enhance recruitment to clinical trials.
AIM: To examine general practitioner (GP) and patient recruitment in a randomised clinical trial to determine the usefulness of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in the diagnosis of heart failure in the community. METHODS: Different techniques were used to maximise GP recruitment including early consultation with GPs, benefits for participating GPs and patients, and a comprehensive suburb-by-suburb approach to GPs using letters and personal visits. GPs then referred patients. At the conclusion of the study, GPs were given a questionnaire focussing on barriers to referral and reasons for participation. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty seven GPs from 135 practices were sent an introductory letter; 294 were eligible to participate. Of these, 186 GPs (63% of eligible GPs) agreed to participate. Ninety two GPs (31% of eligible GPs) from 62 practices referred 307 patients to the study (range 1-14 patients). There were no significant differences between referring and non-referring GPs with respect to sociodemographic characteristics. Referring GPs were very supportive of GP participation in research and strongly agreed that GPs should be reimbursed for involvement in trials. CONCLUSIONS:Patient recruitment by GPs may be aided by the use of a range of strategies including financial reimbursement. GPs who agree to participate will not always recruit patients. Closer collaboration and understanding between primary healthcare professionals and researchers may further enhance recruitment to clinical trials.
Authors: Shellie D Ellis; Alain G Bertoni; Denise E Bonds; C Randall Clinch; Aarthi Balasubramanyam; Caroline Blackwell; Haiying Chen; Michael Lischke; David C Goff Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2006-09-01 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Henry Brodaty; Louisa Hr Gibson; Melissa L Waine; Allan M Shell; Ruth Lilian; Constance Dimity Pond Journal: Ment Health Fam Med Date: 2013-09
Authors: Jacques J X R Geraets; Imelda J M de Groot; Mariëlle E J B Goossens; Camiel P C de Bruijn; Rob A de Bie; Wim J A van den Heuvel; Geert-Jan Dinant Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Claire Snowdon; Diana R Elbourne; Jo Garcia; Marion K Campbell; Vikki A Entwistle; David Francis; Adrian M Grant; Rosemary C Knight; Alison M McDonald; Ian Roberts Journal: Trials Date: 2006-12-21 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Sally E M Bell-Syer; Lucy N Thorpe; Kate Thomas; Hugh Macpherson Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2010-11-01 Impact factor: 2.629