Literature DB >> 17028985

Improvement of best practice in early breast cancer: actionable surgeon and hospital factors.

Marjan Gort1, Manda Broekhuis, Renée Otter, Niek S Klazinga.   

Abstract

To identify actionable elements for improving best practice, this study examined the relative effects of patient, surgeon and hospital factors on surgical treatment variation of 2,929 early breast cancer patients, diagnosed from January 1998 to January 2002 in the region of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre North-Netherlands. Multilevel logistic regression was used to analyze the hierarchically structured data. Apart from the patient level, 43.3% of the treatment variation was due to the hospital and 56.7% to the surgeon, after adjustment for patient characteristics. Although hospital factors like volume, teaching status, and management and policy contributed to this variation, multidisciplinary care seemed the most important actionable hospital factor. Although the surgeon was shown to be an important starting point for quality improvement, actionable elements seemed difficult to identify as factors like surgeon experience and volume were not conclusive and significant variance on this level remained (sigma2 = 0.149, SE 0.053). We conclude that multidisciplinary care can improve best practice and that further research into actionable surgeon factors is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17028985     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9327-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  8 in total

1.  Genomic heterogeneity of breast tumor pathogenesis.

Authors:  Rachel E Ellsworth; Jeffrey A Hooke; Craig D Shriver; Darrell L Ellsworth
Journal:  Clin Med Oncol       Date:  2009-07-29

2.  Breast cancer in the personal genomics era.

Authors:  Rachel E Ellsworth; David J Decewicz; Craig D Shriver; Darrell L Ellsworth
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.236

3.  Influence of hospital type on survival in stage IV colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nobuaki Hoshino; Suguru Hasegawa; Koya Hida; Kenji Kawada; Ryosuke Okamura; Madoka Hamada; Yoshinori Munemoto; Yoshiharu Sakai; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Molecular alterations associated with breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  Laura M Voeghtly; Kim Mamula; J Leigh Campbell; Craig D Shriver; Rachel E Ellsworth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Clinical outcome data for symptomatic breast cancer: the Breast Cancer Clinical Outcome Measures (BCCOM) Project.

Authors:  T Bates; O Kearins; I Monypenny; C Lagord; G Lawrence
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Structural/organizational characteristics of health services partly explain racial variation in timeliness of radiation therapy among elderly breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Stephanie B Wheeler; William R Carpenter; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Anna P Schenck; Morris Weinberger; Andrea K Biddle
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Tumour location within the breast: Does tumour site have prognostic ability?

Authors:  Seth Rummel; Matthew T Hueman; Nick Costantino; Craig D Shriver; Rachel E Ellsworth
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2015-07-13

8.  Volume-outcome revisited: The effect of hospital and surgeon volumes on multiple outcome measures in oesophago-gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Claudia Fischer; Hester Lingsma; Niek Klazinga; Richard Hardwick; David Cromwell; Ewout Steyerberg; Oliver Groene
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.