Literature DB >> 17028869

Second-look arthroscopic findings of 208 patients after ACL reconstruction.

Jin Hwan Ahn1, Jae Chul Yoo, Hyoung Seop Yang, Jae Hoon Kim, Joon Ho Wang.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to report the arthroscopic subjective findings of reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with good clinical outcome. Graft used for reconstruction was either patella bone-tendon-bone (PBTB) autograft or hamstring tendon [quadrupled semitendinous and gracilis tendon (QSGT)] autograft. From March 1997 to September 2003, among 716 ACL reconstructions 209 knees (208 patients) were available for second-look arthroscopy at a mean 21.2-month (range, 14-70 months) postoperative period. The second-look arthroscopy focused on the evaluation of (1) continuity of the reconstructed ACL graft, (2) subjective graft tension using a probe, (3) the extent of synovial coverage, (4) the prevalence of cyclops or cyclops-like lesion, and (5) bony change after notchplasty. Patellar tendon autograft was used in 80 knees, hamstring tendon autograft in 129 knees. Just prior to second-look arthroscopy two objective clinical evaluations, KT-2000 arthrometer and Lysholm knee score, were performed to verify good clinical outcomes. A comparison between the hamstring tendon group and the patella tendon group, hamstring group showed slightly better results in Lysholm knee scores and KT-2000 arthrometer but there were no statistically significant differences (p>0.05). Undetected partial graft tear was seen in 21 knees (10%). With regard to graft tension, a total of 181 grafts (87%) showed normal tension and 28 (13%) showed slight lax tension. The overall synovial coverage was poor in nine (4%) knees. The synovial coverage was slightly better in the hamstring tendon group. A total of 45 knees (21.5%) showed cyclops-like lesion in variable sizes and locations. Reformation of the notch was seen in 85 knees (40%). In conclusion, the findings of second-look arthroscopy of reconstructed ACL in good clinical outcome patients showed approximately 10% partial graft tear, 5% poor synovial coverage, 20% cyclops-like lesion, and 40% some notch reformation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17028869     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-006-0177-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  26 in total

1.  Cross-pin femoral fixation: a new technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee.

Authors:  R Clark; R E Olsen; B J Larson; E M Goble; R P Farrer
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 2.  On the interpretation of our anterior cruciate ligament data.

Authors:  D L Butler; E S Grood; F R Noyes; A N Sodd
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Intra-articular cruciate reconstruction. I: Perspectives on graft strength, vascularization, and immediate motion after replacement.

Authors:  F R Noyes; D L Butler; L E Paulos; E S Grood
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft.

Authors:  I S Corry; J M Webb; A J Clingeleffer; L A Pinczewski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation. Initial comparison of patellar tendon and semitendinosus autografts in young fresh cadavers.

Authors:  N J Rowden; D Sher; G J Rogers; K Schindhelm
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using four-strand semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts and metal interference screw fixation.

Authors:  Philippe Colombet; Michel Allard; Vincent Bousquet; Christophe de Lavigne; Pierre-Henri Flurin; Christophe Lachaud
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  The strength of the central third patellar tendon graft. A biomechanical study.

Authors:  D E Cooper; X H Deng; A L Burstein; R F Warren
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Retrospective direct comparison of three intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  P F Holmes; S L James; R L Larson; K M Singer; D C Jones
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon using Endobutton fixation on the femoral side.

Authors:  W Nebelung; R Becker; M Merkel; M Röpke
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  A comparison of the doubled semitendinosus/gracilis and central third of the patellar tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  A L Otero; L Hutcheson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  23 in total

1.  Function, osteoarthritis and activity after ACL-rupture: 11 years follow-up results of conservative versus reconstructive treatment.

Authors:  M A Kessler; H Behrend; S Henz; G Stutz; A Rukavina; M S Kuster
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Synovialization on second-look arthroscopy after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using Achilles allograft in active young men.

Authors:  Jung Ho Noh; Bo Gyu Yang; Young Hak Roh; Jun Suk Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Hamstring autograft maturation is superior to tibialis allograft following anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Sang-Gyun Kim; Soo-Hyun Kim; Jae-Gyoon Kim; Ki-Mo Jang; Hong-Chul Lim; Ji-Hoon Bae
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Cyclops lesions detected by MRI are frequent findings after ACL surgical reconstruction but do not impact clinical outcome over 2 years.

Authors:  Luca Facchetti; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Alexandra S Gersing; Julio Brandao Guimaraes; Lorenzo Nardo; Sharmila Majumdar; Benjamin C Ma; Thomas M Link; Xiaojuan Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Notchplasty alters knee biomechanics after anatomic ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Yongtao Mao; Brandon Marshall; Taylor Price; Monica Linde; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu; Carola F van Eck
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Second-look arthroscopic findings and clinical results after polyethylene terephthalate augmented anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Johannes Struewer; Ewgeni Ziring; Bernd Ishaque; Turgay Efe; Tim Schwarting; Benjamin Buecking; Karl F Schüttler; Steffen Ruchholtz; Thomas M Frangen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Comparison of Achilles and tibialis anterior tendon allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Seung-Ju Kim; Ji-Hoon Bae; Hong-chul Lim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Intercondylar notch size influences cyclops formation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Masataka Fujii; Takayuki Furumatsu; Shinichi Miyazawa; Yukimasa Okada; Takaaki Tanaka; Toshifumi Ozaki; Nobuhiro Abe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Prospective randomized comparison of anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Ying-fang Ao; Jian-quan Wang; Guo-qing Cui
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Serial MRI and clinical assessment of cyclops lesions.

Authors:  Satyen Gohil; Travis M Falconer; William Breidahl; Peter O Annear
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.