Literature DB >> 17028335

On the generalized poisson regression mixture model for mapping quantitative trait loci with count data.

Yuehua Cui1, Dong-Yun Kim, Jun Zhu.   

Abstract

Statistical methods for mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) have been extensively studied. While most existing methods assume normal distribution of the phenotype, the normality assumption could be easily violated when phenotypes are measured in counts. One natural choice to deal with count traits is to apply the classical Poisson regression model. However, conditional on covariates, the Poisson assumption of mean-variance equality may not be valid when data are potentially under- or overdispersed. In this article, we propose an interval-mapping approach for phenotypes measured in counts. We model the effects of QTL through a generalized Poisson regression model and develop efficient likelihood-based inference procedures. This approach, implemented with the EM algorithm, allows for a genomewide scan for the existence of QTL throughout the entire genome. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated through extensive simulation studies along with comparisons with existing approaches such as the Poisson regression and the generalized estimating equation approach. An application to a rice tiller number data set is given. Our approach provides a standard procedure for mapping QTL involved in the genetic control of complex traits measured in counts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17028335      PMCID: PMC1698633          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.061960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  21 in total

1.  Mixed Poisson regression models with covariate dependent rates.

Authors:  P Wang; M L Puterman; I Cockburn; N Le
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  The genetic architecture of quantitative traits.

Authors:  T F Mackay
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  Mapping quantitative trait Loci using generalized estimating equations.

Authors:  C Lange; J C Whittaker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Quantitative trait loci on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 11, 12, and 18 control variation in levels of T and B lymphocyte subpopulations.

Authors:  M A Hall; P J Norman; B Thiel; H Tiwari; A Peiffer; R W Vaughan; S Prescott; M Leppert; N J Schork; J S Lanchbury
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-04-09       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Statistical power of QTL mapping methods applied to bacteria counts.

Authors:  P Tilquin; W Coppieters; J M Elsen; F Lantier; C Moreno; P V Baret
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Quantitative trait loci associated with adventitious shoot formation in tissue culture and the program of shoot development in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Sonia Lall; Dan Nettleton; Rhonda DeCook; Ping Che; Stephen H Howell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers.

Authors:  C S Haley; S A Knott
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  A hierarchical Poisson mixture regression model to analyse maternity length of hospital stay.

Authors:  K Wang; Kelvin K W Yau; Andy H Lee
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  FXR and ABCG5/ABCG8 as determinants of cholesterol gallstone formation from quantitative trait locus mapping in mice.

Authors:  Henning Wittenburg; Malcolm A Lyons; Renhua Li; Gary A Churchill; Martin C Carey; Beverly Paigen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  A generalized estimating equations approach to quantitative trait locus detection of non-normal traits.

Authors:  Peter C Thomson
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  7 in total

1.  Utilizing prospective sequence analysis of SHH, ZIC2, SIX3 and TGIF in holoprosencephaly probands to describe the parameters limiting the observed frequency of mutant gene×gene interactions.

Authors:  Erich Roessler; Jorge I Vélez; Nan Zhou; Maximilian Muenke
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.797

2.  A statistical model for testing the pleiotropic control of phenotypic plasticity for a count trait.

Authors:  Chang-Xing Ma; Qibin Yu; Arthur Berg; Derek Drost; Evandro Novaes; Guifang Fu; John Stephen Yap; Aixin Tan; Matias Kirst; Yuehua Cui; Rongling Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Generalized linear model for interval mapping of quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  Shizhong Xu; Zhiqiu Hu
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Bayesian GWAS and network analysis revealed new candidate genes for number of teats in pigs.

Authors:  L L Verardo; F F Silva; L Varona; M D V Resende; J W M Bastiaansen; P S Lopes; S E F Guimarães
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Zero-inflated Poisson regression models for QTL mapping applied to tick-resistance in a Gyr × Holstein F2 population.

Authors:  Fabyano Fonseca Silva; Karen P Tunin; Guilherme J M Rosa; Marcos V B da Silva; Ana Luisa Souza Azevedo; Rui da Silva Verneque; Marco Antonio Machado; Irineu Umberto Packer
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 1.771

6.  Generalized linear model for mapping discrete trait loci implemented with LASSO algorithm.

Authors:  Jun Xing; Huijiang Gao; Yang Wu; Yani Wu; Hongwang Li; Runqing Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Revealing new candidate genes for reproductive traits in pigs: combining Bayesian GWAS and functional pathways.

Authors:  Lucas L Verardo; Fabyano F Silva; Marcos S Lopes; Ole Madsen; John W M Bastiaansen; Egbert F Knol; Mathew Kelly; Luis Varona; Paulo S Lopes; Simone E F Guimarães
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.297

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.