BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cholesterol gallstone formation is a complex genetic trait. To identify additional cholesterol gallstone susceptibility loci, we performed a quantitative trait locus analysis using an intercross of PERA/Ei and I/LnJ inbred strains of mice. METHODS: Mice of both sexes were examined for gallstone weight and evaluated according to a scoring system for the physical chemistry of cholelithiasis during feeding of a lithogenic diet. Intercross offspring were genotyped, and linkage analysis was performed by interval mapping. Differences in messenger RNA expression of positional candidate genes were determined using reverse-transcription and real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: We identified significant loci associated with gallstone weight on chromosomes 10 and 4, named Lith7 and Lith8, respectively (both susceptibility alleles conferred by strain I/LnJ). Positional candidate genes with higher expression in I/LnJ mice are Fxr (official symbol, Nr1h4), encoding the nuclear bile salt receptor, on chromosome 10 and Shp1 (official symbol, Nr0b2), encoding the small heterodimer partner 1, on chromosome 4. A significant locus associated with gallstone score on chromosome 17, named Lith9 (susceptibility allele conferred by strain PERA/Ei), colocalizes with the genes Abcg5 and Abcg8 that encode the canalicular cholesterol transporter. Higher hepatic messenger RNA expression of Abcg5 and Abcg8 in strain PERA/Ei correlates positively with higher biliary cholesterol levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a primary role of the nuclear bile salt receptor FXR and the canalicular cholesterol transporter ABCG5/ABCG8 in the genetic susceptibility and pathogenesis of cholesterol cholelithiasis in these strains of inbred mice.
BACKGROUND & AIMS:Cholesterolgallstone formation is a complex genetic trait. To identify additional cholesterolgallstone susceptibility loci, we performed a quantitative trait locus analysis using an intercross of PERA/Ei and I/LnJ inbred strains of mice. METHODS:Mice of both sexes were examined for gallstone weight and evaluated according to a scoring system for the physical chemistry of cholelithiasis during feeding of a lithogenic diet. Intercross offspring were genotyped, and linkage analysis was performed by interval mapping. Differences in messenger RNA expression of positional candidate genes were determined using reverse-transcription and real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: We identified significant loci associated with gallstone weight on chromosomes 10 and 4, named Lith7 and Lith8, respectively (both susceptibility alleles conferred by strain I/LnJ). Positional candidate genes with higher expression in I/LnJ mice are Fxr (official symbol, Nr1h4), encoding the nuclear bile salt receptor, on chromosome 10 and Shp1 (official symbol, Nr0b2), encoding the small heterodimer partner 1, on chromosome 4. A significant locus associated with gallstone score on chromosome 17, named Lith9 (susceptibility allele conferred by strain PERA/Ei), colocalizes with the genes Abcg5 and Abcg8 that encode the canalicular cholesterol transporter. Higher hepatic messenger RNA expression of Abcg5 and Abcg8 in strain PERA/Ei correlates positively with higher biliary cholesterol levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a primary role of the nuclear bile salt receptor FXR and the canalicular cholesterol transporter ABCG5/ABCG8 in the genetic susceptibility and pathogenesis of cholesterol cholelithiasis in these strains of inbred mice.
Authors: Henning Wittenburg; Malcolm A Lyons; Renhua Li; Ulrike Kurtz; Joachim Mössner; Gary A Churchill; Martin C Carey; Beverly Paigen Journal: Mamm Genome Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 2.957
Authors: Luanne L Peters; Weidong Zhang; Amy J Lambert; Carlo Brugnara; Gary A Churchill; Orah S Platt Journal: Mamm Genome Date: 2005-10-29 Impact factor: 2.957
Authors: Gideon M Hirschfield; Roger W Chapman; Tom H Karlsen; Frank Lammert; Konstantinos N Lazaridis; Andrew L Mason Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-04-10 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Olga Renner; Simone Harsch; Elke Schaeffeler; Stefan Winter; Matthias Schwab; Marcin Krawczyk; Jonas Rosendahl; Henning Wittenburg; Frank Lammert; Eduard F Stange Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 3.240