Literature DB >> 17028132

Mechanism of the difference in the binding affinity of E. coli tRNAGln to glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase caused by noninterface nucleotides in variable loop.

Satoshi Yamasaki1, Shugo Nakamura, Tohru Terada, Kentaro Shimizu.   

Abstract

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs) distinguish their cognate tRNAs from many other kinds of tRNAs, despite the very similar tertiary structures of tRNAs. Many researchers have supported the view that this recognition is achieved by intermolecular interactions between tRNA and ARS. However, one of the aptamers of Escherichia coli glutamine specific tRNA, var-AGGU, has a higher affinity to ARS than the wild-type, although the sequence difference only lies in the variable loop located on the opposite side of the binding interface with ARS. To understand the reason for the difference in affinity, we did molecular dynamics simulations on tRNAs and their complexes with ARS. We calculated the enthalpic and entropic contributions to the binding free energy with the molecular mechanics-Poisson-Boltzmann/surface area method and found that the entropic difference plays an important role in the difference in binding free energies. During the molecular dynamics simulations, dynamic rearrangements of hydrogen bonds occurred in the tertiary core region of the wild-type tRNA, whereas they were not observed in the free var-AGGU simulation. Since the internal mobility was suppressed upon complex formation with ARS, the entropy loss in the wild-type was larger than that of the aptamer. We therefore concluded that the sequence difference in the variable loop caused the difference in the internal mobility of the tertiary core region tRNAs and led to the difference in the affinity to ARS through the entropy term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17028132      PMCID: PMC1697856          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.093351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  23 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Comparison of tRNA motions in the free and ribosomal bound structures.

Authors:  Yongmei Wang; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-08-19       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Universal rules and idiosyncratic features in tRNA identity.

Authors:  R Giegé; M Sissler; C Florentz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Geometric versus topological clustering: an insight into conformation mapping.

Authors:  O M Becker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1997-02

5.  Discrimination between glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase and seryl-tRNA synthetase involves nucleotides in the acceptor helix of tRNA.

Authors:  M J Rogers; D Söll
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Restrained refinement of the monoclinic form of yeast phenylalanine transfer RNA. Temperature factors and dynamics, coordinated waters, and base-pair propeller twist angles.

Authors:  E Westhof; M Sundaralingam
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1986-08-26       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Dynamics of transfer RNAs analyzed by normal mode calculation.

Authors:  S Nakamura; J Doi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Use of MM-PBSA in reproducing the binding free energies to HIV-1 RT of TIBO derivatives and predicting the binding mode to HIV-1 RT of efavirenz by docking and MM-PBSA.

Authors:  J Wang; P Morin; W Wang; P A Kollman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Recognition of bases in Escherichia coli tRNA(Gln) by glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase: a complete identity set.

Authors:  Y Hayase; M Jahn; M J Rogers; L A Sylvers; M Koizumi; H Inoue; E Ohtsuka; D Söll
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Molecular dynamics simulations of nucleic acid-protein complexes.

Authors:  Alexander D Mackerell; Lennart Nilsson
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  Simulation study of the ability of a computationally-designed peptide to recognize target tRNALys3 and other decoy tRNAs.

Authors:  Xingqing Xiao; Binwu Zhao; Paul F Agris; Carol K Hall
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 3.  RNA Structural Dynamics As Captured by Molecular Simulations: A Comprehensive Overview.

Authors:  Jiří Šponer; Giovanni Bussi; Miroslav Krepl; Pavel Banáš; Sandro Bottaro; Richard A Cunha; Alejandro Gil-Ley; Giovanni Pinamonti; Simón Poblete; Petr Jurečka; Nils G Walter; Michal Otyepka
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Exit strategies for charged tRNA from GluRS.

Authors:  Alexis Black Pyrkosz; John Eargle; Anurag Sethi; Zaida Luthey-Schulten
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Role of salt-bridging interactions in recognition of viral RNA by arginine-rich peptides.

Authors:  Lev Levintov; Harish Vashisth
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Recognition of pyrrolysine tRNA by the Desulfitobacterium hafniense pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase.

Authors:  Stephanie Herring; Alexandre Ambrogelly; Carla R Polycarpo; Dieter Söll
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  MD Simulations of tRNA and Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases: Dynamics, Folding, Binding, and Allostery.

Authors:  Rongzhong Li; Lindsay M Macnamara; Jessica D Leuchter; Rebecca W Alexander; Samuel S Cho
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.