Literature DB >> 17027966

Determining when contamination is pollution - weight of evidence determinations for sediments and effluents.

Peter M Chapman1.   

Abstract

Contamination is simply the presence of a substance where it should not be or at concentrations above background. Pollution is contamination that results in or can result in adverse biological effects to resident communities. All pollutants are contaminants, but not all contaminants are pollutants. Differentiating pollution from contamination cannot be done solely on the basis of chemical analyses because such analyses provide no information on bioavailability or on toxicity. Effects-based measures such as laboratory or field toxicity tests and measures of the status of resident, exposed communities provide key information, but cannot be used independently to determine pollution status. Laboratory studies can be predictive, but are rarely realistic. Measures of resident communities include innate natural variability and cannot easily distinguish between adaptation to contamination (a genetic process) and acclimation (a physiological process that may decrease energy reserves, possibly reducing such critical population-level parameters as reproduction). Finally, contaminant effects may not only be direct but also indirect; predicting such effects requires knowledge of the system under study as well as appropriate use of lines of evidence (LOE) such as toxicity tests directed to key species. Consequently, in sediments, effluents or other inputs/environmental compartments, determining when contamination is or may in future become pollution, requires a weight of evidence (WOE) assessment using different LOE appropriate to the situation under investigation. WOE investigations provide two different types of information: definitive conclusions regarding pollution; or, information as to what additional, investigative studies are necessary for definitive conclusions. Effectively, a WOE assessment comprises an initial screening-level ecological risk assessment (ERA), which may be followed by a detailed-level ERA if key uncertainties need to be resolved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17027966     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2006.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  23 in total

1.  Effect of water quality and confounding factors on digestive enzyme activities in Gammarus fossarum.

Authors:  L Charron; O Geffard; A Chaumot; R Coulaud; H Queau; A Geffard; O Dedourge-Geffard
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Transcriptomic analyses in a benthic fish exposed to contaminated estuarine sediments through laboratory and in situ bioassays.

Authors:  Pedro M Costa; Célia Miguel; Sandra Caeiro; Jorge Lobo; Marta Martins; Ana M Ferreira; Miguel Caetano; Carlos Vale; T A DelValls; Maria H Costa
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  A weight of evidence framework for environmental assessments: Inferring qualities.

Authors:  Glenn Suter; Susan Cormier; Mace Barron
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.992

4.  Determination of a new index of sexual maturity (ISM) in zebra mussel using flow cytometry: interest in ecotoxicology.

Authors:  Gabrielle Magniez; Alban Franco; Alain Geffard; Damien Rioult; Isabelle Bonnard; Laurence Delahaut; Sandrine Joachim; Gaëlle Daniele; Emmanuelle Vulliet; Jean-Marc Porcher; Marc Bonnard
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Assessment of whole-sediment chronic toxicity using sub-lethal endpoints with Monocorophium insidiosum.

Authors:  Marco Picone; Martina Bergamin; Eugenia Delaney; Annamaria Volpi Ghirardini
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Hepatic proteome changes in Solea senegalensis exposed to contaminated estuarine sediments: a laboratory and in situ survey.

Authors:  Pedro M Costa; Eduardo Chicano-Gálvez; Sandra Caeiro; Jorge Lobo; Marta Martins; Ana M Ferreira; Miguel Caetano; Carlos Vale; José Alhama-Carmona; Juan Lopez-Barea; T Angel DelValls; Maria H Costa
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Do morphometric parameters and geological conditions determine chemistry of glacier surface ice? Spatial distribution of contaminants present in the surface ice of Spitsbergen glaciers (European Arctic).

Authors:  Sara Lehmann; Grzegorz Gajek; Stanisław Chmiel; Żaneta Polkowska
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Technological Enthusiasm: Morally Commendable or Reprehensible?

Authors:  Mahdi Kafaee
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Comparison of the partitioning of pesticides relative to the survival and behaviour of exposed amphipods.

Authors:  Jocelyne Hellou; Jim Leonard; Art Cook; Ken Doe; Kathryn Dunphy; Paula Jackman; Laurie Tremblay; Joanna Mills Flemming
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  Integrated ecotoxicological assessment of marine sediments affected by land-based marine fish farm effluents: physicochemical, acute toxicity and benthic community analyses.

Authors:  C Silva; E Yáñez; M L Martín-Díaz; I Riba; T A DelValls
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.