Literature DB >> 17027402

Self-reported patient outcomes at a minimum of 5 years after allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without medial meniscus transplantation: an age-, sex-, and activity level-matched comparison in patients aged approximately 50 years.

Daniel Rueff1, John Nyland, Yavuz Kocabey, Haw Chong Chang, David N M Caborn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patient outcomes at a minimum of 5 years after medial meniscus transplantation and primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction via allograft tissues were compared with those of age-, sex-, and activity level-matched patients who underwent meniscal repair or partial meniscectomy and primary ACL reconstruction via allograft tissues.
METHODS: Eight patients (mean age, 51 +/- 5 years; three women and five men) at 5.5 +/- 0.5 years after medial meniscus transplantation and ACL reconstruction (group 1) and eight matched patients (mean age, 50 +/- 5 years; three women and five men) at 5.1 +/- 0.5 years after meniscal repair or partial meniscectomy and ACL reconstruction (group 2) completed the meniscus allograft clinical registry questionnaire, which combined the modified Lysholm knee scoring scale, the 1999 International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee evaluation, and the knee pain level score on a 10-cm visual analog scale.
RESULTS: Both groups displayed similar improvements in the modified Lysholm knee scoring scale components of pain, knee stability, squatting, stair climbing, and limping, as well as overall score (P < .05). Only group 2 displayed significant reductions in swelling. The groups displayed similar improvements in the 1999 International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee evaluation components of sitting, rising from a chair, running, jumping, and stopping quickly, as well as overall score (P < .05). They also displayed significant improvements in the visual analog scale knee pain level score; however, group 1, which displayed greater preoperative pain levels, had considerably larger reductions. Most group 1 patients (7/8 [87.5%]) and all group 2 patients (8/8 [100%]) considered their surgery to be a success and would undergo the same procedure again if necessary.
CONCLUSIONS: Although group 1 had greater preoperative knee pain levels, their pain levels at 5 years postoperatively were comparable to those in group 2. With the exception of swelling, comparable improvements were observed between groups for all other variables. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective, case-control study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17027402     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  10 in total

Review 1.  Meniscal allograft transplantation. Part 2: systematic review of transplant timing, outcomes, return to competition, associated procedures, and prevention of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Gonzalo Samitier; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Dean C Taylor; Brian Rill; Terrence Lock; Vasilius Moutzouros; Patricia Kolowich
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Concomitant Arthroscopic Meniscal Allograft Transplantation and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Bryan M Saltzman; Justin W Griffin; Nathan Wetters; Maximilian A Meyer; Brian J Cole; Adam B Yanke
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-10-11

Review 3.  Meniscus tear surgery and meniscus replacement.

Authors:  Javier Vaquero; Francisco Forriol
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-05-19

4.  Twenty-six years of meniscal allograft transplantation: is it still experimental? A meta-analysis of 44 trials.

Authors:  Mohamed Elattar; Aad Dhollander; René Verdonk; Karl Fredrik Almqvist; Peter Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The role of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the older patients, 55 years or above.

Authors:  James Edmund Arbuthnot; Rodney B Brink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on kinematics of the knee with combined anterior cruciate ligament injury and subtotal medial meniscectomy: an in vitro robotic investigation.

Authors:  Jong Keun Seon; Hemanth R Gadikota; Michal Kozanek; Luke S Oh; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Does meniscus removal affect ACL-deficient knee laxity? An in vivo study.

Authors:  S Zaffagnini; C Signorelli; T Bonanzinga; A Grassi; H Galán; I Akkawi; L Bragonzoni; F Cataldi; M Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Meniscal allograft transplantation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Manolito De Bruycker; Peter C M Verdonk; René C Verdonk
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-04-21

9.  How Are We Measuring Patient Satisfaction After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

Authors:  Cynthia A Kahlenberg; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Richard A Ferraro; William W Schairer; Michael E Steinhaus; Answorth A Allen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-12-10

Review 10.  Meniscal allograft transplantation in a symptomatic meniscal deficient knee: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nick A Smith; Nicola MacKay; Matthew Costa; Tim Spalding
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 4.342

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.