Literature DB >> 17027396

The "other" transformation required for visual-auditory integration: representational format.

Kristin Kelly Porter1, Jennifer M Groh.   

Abstract

Multisensory integration of spatial signals requires not only that stimulus locations be encoded in the same spatial reference frame, but also that stimulus locations be encoded in the same representational format. Previous studies have addressed the issue of spatial reference frame, but representational format, particularly for sound location, has been relatively overlooked. We discuss here our recent findings that sound location in the primate inferior colliculus is encoded using a "rate" code, a format that differs from the place code used for representing visual stimulus locations. Possible mechanisms for transforming signals from rate-to-place or place-to-rate coding formats are considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17027396     DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)55018-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  10 in total

Review 1.  Psychophysics and neuronal bases of sound localization in humans.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Norbert Kopčo; Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Similar prevalence and magnitude of auditory-evoked and visually evoked activity in the frontal eye fields: implications for multisensory motor control.

Authors:  Valeria C Caruso; Daniel S Pages; Marc A Sommer; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Beyond the labeled line: variation in visual reference frames from intraparietal cortex to frontal eye fields and the superior colliculus.

Authors:  Valeria C Caruso; Daniel S Pages; Marc A Sommer; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The effects of interaural time difference and intensity on the coding of low-frequency sounds in the mammalian midbrain.

Authors:  Domonkos Horvath; Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A rate code for sound azimuth in monkey auditory cortex: implications for human neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Uri Werner-Reiss; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Reference frame of the ventriloquism aftereffect.

Authors:  Norbert Kopco; I-Fan Lin; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Multisensory guidance of orienting behavior.

Authors:  Joost X Maier; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Spatiotemporal architecture of cortical receptive fields and its impact on multisensory interactions.

Authors:  David W Royal; Brian N Carriere; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Different stimuli, different spatial codes: a visual map and an auditory rate code for oculomotor space in the primate superior colliculus.

Authors:  Jungah Lee; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Population rate-coding predicts correctly that human sound localization depends on sound intensity.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Nima Alamatsaz; Robert M Shapley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 8.140

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.