Literature DB >> 17027153

Response delay and spatial representation in pointing movements.

Laurette Hay1, Christine Redon.   

Abstract

Pointing movements decrease in accuracy when target information is removed before movement onset. This time effect was analyzed in relation with the spatial representation of the target location, which can be egocentric (i.e. in relation to the body) or exocentric (i.e. in relation to the external world) depending on the visual environment of the target. The accuracy of pointing movements performed without visual feedback was measured in two delay conditions: 0 and 5-s delay between target removal and movement onset. In each delay condition, targets were presented either in the darkness (egocentric localization) or within a structured visual background (exocentric localization). The results show that pointing was more accurate when targets were presented within a visual background than in the darkness. The time-related decrease in accuracy was observed in the darkness condition, whereas no delay effect was found in the presence of a visual background. Therefore, contextual factors applied to a simple pointing action might induce different spatial representations: a short-lived sensorimotor egocentric representation used in immediate action control, or a long-lived perceptual exocentric representation which drives perception and delayed action.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17027153     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.08.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  8 in total

Review 1.  The retrosplenial-parietal network and reference frame coordination for spatial navigation.

Authors:  Benjamin J Clark; Christine M Simmons; Laura E Berkowitz; Aaron A Wilber
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Influence of age, spatial memory, and ocular fixation on localization of auditory, visual, and bimodal targets by human subjects.

Authors:  Marina S Dobreva; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Interaction of egocentric and world-centered reference frames in the rat posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Aaron A Wilber; Benjamin J Clark; Tyler C Forster; Masami Tatsuno; Bruce L McNaughton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  No effect of delay on the spatial representation of serial reach targets.

Authors:  Immo Schütz; Denise Y P Henriques; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Scene Configuration and Object Reliability Affect the Use of Allocentric Information for Memory-Guided Reaching.

Authors:  Mathias Klinghammer; Gunnar Blohm; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Unilateral vestibular loss impairs external space representation.

Authors:  Liliane Borel; Christine Redon-Zouiteni; Pierre Cauvin; Michel Dumitrescu; Arnaud Devèze; Jacques Magnan; Patrick Péruch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Spatial task context makes short-latency reaches prone to induced Roelofs illusion.

Authors:  Bahareh Taghizadeh; Alexander Gail
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Integration of egocentric and allocentric information during memory-guided reaching to images of a natural environment.

Authors:  Katja Fiehler; Christian Wolf; Mathias Klinghammer; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.