Literature DB >> 17027127

Changes in the inferior alveolar nerve following sagittal split ramus osteotomy in monkeys: a comparison of monocortical and bicortical fixation.

J Hu1, Q Zhao, J Tang, Z Zheng, M C Qi.   

Abstract

We aimed to observe the changes in the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) using monocortical or bicortical screw fixation. Bilateral SSRO for setback of the mandible was done in 12 monkeys, and monocortical or bicortical fixation was applied on opposing sides of each mandible. Sensory nerve action potentials were tested before and immediately after operation, and at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Six animals selected randomly were killed at 4 and 12 weeks after the operation. Specimens of nerve were harvested and processed for histological examination and electron microscopic analysis. Obvious prolongation of latency and diminution of amplitude in the IAN were found postoperatively. At 4 weeks after operation, Wallerian degeneration was apparent, and there were signs of axonal regeneration in the nerves. The IAN had more abnormalities of evoked potentials and pathological changes after bicortical than after monocortical fixation. Although considerable recovery was found after both forms of fixation at 12 weeks, the function of the nerve after plate fixation was better than after screw fixation. Our results suggest that the nerve damage during SSRO could be temporary and reversible, and monocortical fixation may result in restoration of the nerve function sooner than bicortical fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17027127     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2006.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  6 in total

1.  Stability of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: Comparison between positioning screws and plate.

Authors:  Nasser Nooh
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2009-10-29

Review 2.  Inferior alveolar nerve injury following orthognathic surgery: a review of assessment issues.

Authors:  C Phillips; G Essick
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 3.837

3.  Investigation of a Modified Novel Technique in Bilateral Sagittal Splitting Osteotomy Fixation: Finite Element Analysis and In Vitro Biomechanical Test.

Authors:  Li-Ren Chang; Chien-Chung Chen; Seng Feng Jeng; Yu-Ray Chen; Lain-Chyr Hwang; Ting-Sheng Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Comparison of strengths of five internal fixation methods used after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Farzin Sarkarat; Atiye Ahmady; Farzam Farahmand; Ali Fateh; Roozbeh Kahali; Amir Nourani; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-08-14

5.  Comparison of postoperative paresthesia after sagittal split osteotomy among different fixation methods: a one year follow-up study.

Authors:  Reza Tabrizi; Kousha Bakrani; Farshid Bastami
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-08-28

6.  Complications or rather side effects? Quantification of patient satisfaction and complications after orthognathic surgery-a retrospective, cross-sectional long-term analysis.

Authors:  Daniel G E Thiem; Daniel Schneider; Michael Hammel; Bassam Saka; Bernhard Frerich; Bilal Al-Nawas; Peer W Kämmerer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.573

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.