Literature DB >> 17025276

A critical review of analytical ultracentrifugation and field flow fractionation methods for measuring protein aggregation.

Jun Liu1, James D Andya, Steven J Shire.   

Abstract

Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) and field flow fractionation (FFF) are 2 important biophysical methods for measuring protein aggregates. Both methods can separate protein monomer from its aggregate forms under a broad range of solution conditions. Recent advances in instrumentation and data analysis, particularly in the field of analytical ultracentrifugation technology, have significantly improved the capability and sensitivity of these biophysical methods for detecting protein aggregates. These advances have resulted in an increased use of these methods in the biopharmaceutical industry for characterization of therapeutic proteins. However, despite their many advantages over conventional methods, the difficulty in the use of the instrumentation and the complexity of data analysis process, have often hampered the widespread use and proper interpretation of data. This article reviews the recent progress in both technologies, and a few case studies are also presented to discuss their advantages and limitations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17025276      PMCID: PMC2761065          DOI: 10.1208/aapsj080367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  18 in total

1.  Modern applications of analytical ultracentrifugation.

Authors:  T M Laue; W F Stafford
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  1999

2.  Boundary analysis in sedimentation transport experiments: a procedure for obtaining sedimentation coefficient distributions using the time derivative of the concentration profile.

Authors:  W F Stafford
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Sedimentation velocity analysis of heterogeneous protein-protein interactions: sedimentation coefficient distributions c(s) and asymptotic boundary profiles from Gilbert-Jenkins theory.

Authors:  Julie Dam; Peter Schuck
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  New revolutions in the evolution of analytical ultracentrifugation.

Authors:  T M Schuster; J M Toedt
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.809

5.  An improved function for fitting sedimentation velocity data for low-molecular-weight solutes.

Authors:  J S Philo
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Identification and interpretation of complexity in sedimentation velocity boundaries.

Authors:  B Demeler; H Saber; J C Hansen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Factors influencing the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins.

Authors:  Huub Schellekens
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.992

8.  Boundary analysis in sedimentation velocity experiments.

Authors:  W F Stafford
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 9.  Analytical ultracentrifugation of complex macromolecular systems.

Authors:  J C Hansen; J Lebowitz; B Demeler
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-11-15       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Size-distribution analysis of macromolecules by sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation and lamm equation modeling.

Authors:  P Schuck
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  43 in total

1.  Phase separation of an IgG1 antibody solution under a low ionic strength condition.

Authors:  Hirotaka Nishi; Makoto Miyajima; Hiroaki Nakagami; Masanori Noda; Susumu Uchiyama; Kiichi Fukui
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Using prior knowledge in the determination of macromolecular size-distributions by analytical ultracentrifugation.

Authors:  Patrick H Brown; Andrea Balbo; Peter Schuck
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 6.988

3.  A new adaptive grid-size algorithm for the simulation of sedimentation velocity profiles in analytical ultracentrifugation.

Authors:  Patrick H Brown; Peter Schuck
Journal:  Comput Phys Commun       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 4.390

4.  A multi-tiered analytical approach for the analysis and quantitation of high-molecular-weight aggregates in a recombinant therapeutic glycoprotein.

Authors:  Heather Hughes; Charles Morgan; Elizabeth Brunyak; Kristen Barranco; Emily Cohen; Tim Edmunds; Karen Lee
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Maleimide conjugation markedly enhances the immunogenicity of both human and murine idiotype-KLH vaccines.

Authors:  Kamran Kafi; David J Betting; Reiko E Yamada; Michael Bacica; Kristopher K Steward; John M Timmerman
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 4.407

Review 6.  Protein particulate detection issues in biotherapeutics development--current status.

Authors:  Tapan K Das
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.246

7.  A platform for characterizing therapeutic monoclonal antibody breakdown products by 2D chromatography and top-down mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Matthew T Mazur; Richard S Seipert; David Mahon; Qinwei Zhou; Tun Liu
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  New methods allowing the detection of protein aggregates: a case study on trastuzumab.

Authors:  Barthélemy Demeule; Caroline Palais; Gia Machaidze; Robert Gurny; Tudor Arvinte
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.857

9.  A bayesian approach for quantifying trace amounts of antibody aggregates by sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation.

Authors:  Patrick H Brown; Andrea Balbo; Peter Schuck
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.009

10.  Challenges and opportunities in the advancement of nanomedicines.

Authors:  Alexander Wei; Jonathan G Mehtala; Anil K Patri
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.