Literature DB >> 17024571

Cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of atrial flutter trial (CRAAFT).

Nicholas John Collins1, Malcolm Barlow, Paul Varghese, James Leitch.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Atrial flutter is frequently treated with radiofrequency (RF) ablation with excellent results. While RF ablation remains the gold standard for catheter based treatment of atrial flutter, cryoablation has potential advantages including painless ablation and cryoadherence to the myocardium. We performed a prospective randomised trial comparing cryoablation and RF ablation in the treatment of atrial flutter. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We randomised 32 consecutive patients with typical atrial flutter to either radiofrequency ablation using an 8 mm tip Blazer II XP catheter (EP Technology, San Jose, USA) or cryoablation using a 9 French 8 mm tip Freezor Max catheter (CryoCath Technologies Inc, Kirkland, QU, Canada). Twenty eight patients were then followed up for a mean of 14.7 months. The procedure was successful in producing isthmus block in all but one patient in the cryoablation group. Cryoablation was associated with a significantly longer procedure (171 vs 99 min) and ablation duration (59 vs 12.7 min), however fluoroscopy exposure was similar (30 vs 29 min). Cryoablation was associated with reduced pain scores compared with RF (mean pain score 0.4 vs 3.5). There were two recurrences of atrial flutter during follow-up, both in the cryoablation group.
CONCLUSIONS: Cryoablation has improved patient tolerability compared to RF ablation, however is associated with longer procedure and ablation durations. Further trials are required to confirm whether cryoablation has similar acute and chronic efficacy to RF ablation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17024571     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-006-9027-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  14 in total

Review 1.  Cryothermal ablation: mechanism of tissue injury and current experience in the treatment of tachyarrhythmias.

Authors:  D L Lustgarten; D Keane; J Ruskin
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.194

2.  Comparison of three rating scales for measuring subjective phenomena in clinical research. I. Use of experimentally controlled auditory stimuli.

Authors:  Carmen Lara-Muñoz; Sergio Ponce De Leon; Alvan R Feinstein; Alicia Puente; Carolyn K Wells
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Comparison between a 7 French 6 mm tip cryothermal catheter and a 9 French 8 mm tip cryothermal catheter for cryoablation treatment of common atrial flutter.

Authors:  Annibale S Montenero; Nicola Bruno; Andrea Antonelli; Daniele Mangiameli; Luca Barbieri; Peter Andrew; Francesco Zumbo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Long-term outcome of patients after successful radiofrequency ablation for typical atrial flutter.

Authors:  David M Gilligan; John S Zakaib; Ithiel Fuller; Richard K Shepard; Dan Dan; Mark A Wood; Henry F Clemo; Bruce S Stambler; Kenneth A Ellenbogen
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  Randomized study comparing radiofrequency ablation with cryoablation for the treatment of atrial flutter with emphasis on pain perception.

Authors:  Carl Timmermans; Gregory M Ayers; Harry J G M Crijns; Luz-Maria Rodriguez
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-03-11       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Atrial flutter update.

Authors:  Francisco G Cosío
Journal:  Card Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2002-12

7.  Long-term efficacy of cryo catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial flutter: results from a repeat electrophysiologic study.

Authors:  Annibale S Montenero; Nicola Bruno; Andrea Antonelli; Daniele Mangiameli; Luca Barbieri; Peter Andrew; Olive Murphy; Stephen O'Connor; Francesco Zumbo
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Acute success and persistence of bidirectional conduction block in the cavotricuspid isthmus one month post cryocatheter ablation of common atrial flutter.

Authors:  Malte Kuniss; Klaus Kurzidim; Harald Greiss; Alexander Berkowitsch; Johannes Sperzel; Christian Hamm; Heinz Friedrich Pitschner
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter: significance of palpitations and quality-of-life evaluation in patients with proven isthmus block.

Authors:  F Anselme; N Saoudi; H Poty; R Douillet; A Cribier
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-02-02       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Catheter-based cryoablation permanently cures patients with common atrial flutter.

Authors:  Randy Manusama; Carl Timmermans; Froylan Limon; Suzanne Philippens; Harry J G M Crijns; Luz-Maria Rodriguez
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  [Complications after ablation of supraventricular tachycardias].

Authors:  Damir Erkapic; Heinz-Friedrich Pitschner
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-07-13

2.  A prospective randomised comparison of large-tip cryoablation and 8-mm-tip radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter.

Authors:  Helena Malmborg; Stefan Lönnerholm; Carina Blomström Lundqvist
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Approaching a decade of cryo catheter ablation for type 1 atrial flutter-a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Peter Andrew; Yasir Hamad; Sandra Jerat; Annibale Montenero; Stephen O'Connor
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Slow pathway elimination for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with the 8-mm tip cryoablation catheter: an 18-month follow-up study.

Authors:  Michaël Peyrol; Pascal Sbragia; Sabrina Uhry; Gilles Boccara; Eric Dolla; Amandine Quatre; Maxime Guenoun; Samuel Lévy; Franck Paganelli
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Myocardial injury during radiofrequency and cryoablation of typical atrial flutter.

Authors:  Serkan Saygi; Nikola Drca; Per Insulander; Jonas Schwieler; Mats Jensen-Urstad; Hamid Bastani
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Efficacy comparison between cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation for patients with cavotricuspid valve isthmus dependent atrial flutter: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi-He Chen; Hui Lin; Cheng-Long Xie; Xiao-Ting Zhang; Yi-Gang Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Evaluation of myocardial injury induced by different ablation approaches (radiofrequency ablation versus cryoablation) in atrial flutter patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qing Zeng; XingSan Li; Ge Xu
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Long term outcome of cavotricuspid isthmus cryoablation for the treatment of common atrial flutter in 180 patients: a single center experience.

Authors:  Wendel Moreira; Carl Timmermans; Hein J J Wellens; Yuka Mizusawa; David Perez; Suzanne Philippens; Luz-Maria Rodriguez
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.900

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.