Literature DB >> 17023854

Anterior exposure of the spine for removal of lumbar interbody devices and implants.

Hoan-Vu Nguyen1, Behrooz A Akbarnia, Bruce E van Dam, Kamshad Raiszadeh, Ramin Bagheri, Sarah Canale, G Mark Sylvain, Robert Barone, Gary Bench.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective review of a consecutive series of 14 patients operated on between March 1998 and April 2005.
OBJECTIVES: To report on patients having undergone revision lumbar surgery anteriorly to remove interbody devices placed anteriorly or posteriorly and to determine the incidence of associated complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The popularity of interbody lumbar surgery has grown in recent years. Consequently, the number of anterior revision procedures has increased. The risks associated with anterior approach for revision procedures and interbody device removal, in particular, have not been reported.
METHODS: The results of 13 consecutive patients who had removal of interbody devices through an anterior approach and 1 patient with removal of anterior fixation (7 males, 7 females; mean age 43 years) were reviewed. The procedure during which the original implant was placed was a posterior lumbar interbody fusion in 4, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 5, and anterior lumbar interbody fusion in 5 patients. Four attending spine surgeons performed the procedures with the assistance of 4 experienced access surgeons.
RESULTS: Ten of 14 (71%) patients had complications associated with anterior exposure of revision surgery. Vascular injury is the most common complication (57%). Vascular complications occurred in 100% (4/4) of the revisions of previous posterior lumbar interbody fusions and 80% (4/5) of previous anterior lumbar interbody fusions. The complication rate at L4-5 and L5-S1 was 89% and 40%, respectively. There was 1 postoperative mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Anterior removal of lumbar interbody devices placed anteriorly or posteriorly has a high incidence of complication. Average blood loss and hospital stay are increased with revision anterior surgery. The vascular complication rate is 2-fold higher at L4-L5 level compared to L5-S1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17023854     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000240271.39583.b6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

1.  Risk factors for medical complications after long-level internal fixation in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  Xi-Nuo Zhang; Xiang-Yao Sun; Xiang-Long Meng; Yong Hai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Revision strategies for ventral implant failure in the lumbar spine exemplified by stand-alone cages].

Authors:  T Tarhan; M Rauschmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Indications, technique, advantages and disadvantages].

Authors:  M Richter; M Weidenfeld; F P Uckmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Analysis of intraoperative difficulties and management of operative complications in revision anterior exposure of the lumbar spine: a report of 25 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Charles-Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette; William Delblond; Alexandre Poignard; Jérôme Allain
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Oblique retroperitoneal approach for lumbar interbody fusion from L1 to S1 in adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Ki-Tack Kim; Dae-Jean Jo; Sang-Hyun Lee; Eun-Min Seo
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 6.  Silicon Nitride as a Biomedical Material: An Overview.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Du; Seunghun S Lee; Gurdial Blugan; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 6.208

7.  Revision for cage migration after transforaminal/posterior lumbar interbody fusion: how to perform revision surgery?

Authors:  Masato Tanaka; Zhang Wei; Akihiro Kanamaru; Shin Masuda; Yoshihiro Fujiwara; Koji Uotani; Shinya Arataki; Taro Yamauchi
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 2.030

8.  Major surgical treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in the elderly: a comparison of anterior spinal fusion, anterior-posterior combined surgery and posterior closing wedge osteotomy.

Authors:  Shota Takenaka; Yoshihiro Mukai; Noboru Hosono; Takeshi Fuji
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-06-09

9.  The comparison between anterior and posterior approaches for removal of infected lumbar interbody cages and a proposal regarding the use of endoscope-assisted technique.

Authors:  Yun-Da Li; Jia-En Chi; Ping-Yeh Chiu; Fu-Cheng Kao; Po-Liang Lai; Tsung-Ting Tsai
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 10.  Use of lateral access in the treatment of the revision spine patient.

Authors:  Samuel S Bederman; Vu H Le; Sohrab Pahlavan; Douglas P Kiester; Nitin N Bhatia; Vedat Deviren
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.