Literature DB >> 17022404

Can highly hydrophobic organic substances cause aquatic baseline toxicity and can they contribute to mixture toxicity?

Philipp Mayer1, Fredrik Reichenberg.   

Abstract

Effect concentrations for aquatic baseline toxicity generally decrease with increasing log octanol-water partition co-efficient (Kow) values of up to 5 to 6, whereas less is known about the baseline toxicity of organic chemicals with log Kow values above 6. A physicochemical analysis of the dissolution process for organic chemicals was combined with reported baseline toxicity data, leading to the following conclusions. First, no absolute hydrophobicity cutoff exists for baseline toxicity at a log Kow value of 6, because aquatic baseline toxicity for fish and algae was observed for chemicals with log Kow values greater than 6.5 and with effect concentrations less than 10 microg/L. Second, the baseline toxicity of hydrophobic organic substances was exerted at a relatively constant chemical activity of 0.01 to 0.1. Finally, organic chemicals with high melting points cannot provide sufficient chemical activity to exert baseline toxicity when considered as individual, pure chemicals. However, such substances are still expected to contribute to baseline toxicity when part of a complex mixture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17022404     DOI: 10.1897/06-142r.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  9 in total

1.  Hydroxyl radical-mediated degradation of diclofenac revisited: a computational approach to assessment of reaction mechanisms and by-products.

Authors:  Sesil Agopcan Cinar; Asu Ziylan-Yavaş; Saron Catak; Nilsun H Ince; Viktorya Aviyente
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  A novel two-step hierarchical quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling work flow for predicting acute toxicity of chemicals in rodents.

Authors:  Hao Zhu; Lin Ye; Ann Richard; Alexander Golbraikh; Fred A Wright; Ivan Rusyn; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 3.  From QSAR to QSIIR: searching for enhanced computational toxicology models.

Authors:  Hao Zhu
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

4.  Maintaining the Constant Exposure Condition for an Acute Caenorhabditis elegans Mortality Test Using Passive Dosing.

Authors:  Hyuck-Chul Kwon; Ji-Yeon Roh; Dongyoung Lim; Jinhee Choi; Jung-Hwan Kwon
Journal:  Environ Health Toxicol       Date:  2011-10-25

5.  QSAR-Based Estimation of Species Sensitivity Distribution Parameters: An Exploratory Investigation.

Authors:  Renske P J Hoondert; Rik Oldenkamp; Dick de Zwart; Dik van de Meent; Leo Posthuma
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  Key Opportunities to Replace, Reduce, and Refine Regulatory Fish Acute Toxicity Tests.

Authors:  Natalie Burden; Rachel Benstead; Kate Benyon; Mark Clook; Christopher Green; John Handley; Neil Harper; Samuel K Maynard; Chris Mead; Audrey Pearson; Kathryn Ryder; Dave Sheahan; Roger van Egmond; James R Wheeler; Thomas H Hutchinson
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.742

7.  Novel ammonium dichloroacetates with enhanced herbicidal activity for weed control.

Authors:  Huanhuan Li; Yajie Ma; Hongyan Hu; Xianpeng Song; Yan Ma; Hong Yan
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.036

8.  Use of cell viability assay data improves the prediction accuracy of conventional quantitative structure-activity relationship models of animal carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Hao Zhu; Ivan Rusyn; Ann Richard; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  A chemical activity approach to exposure and risk assessment of chemicals: Focus articles are part of a regular series intended to sharpen understanding of current and emerging topics of interest to the scientific community.

Authors:  Frank A P C Gobas; Philipp Mayer; Thomas F Parkerton; Robert M Burgess; Dik van de Meent; Todd Gouin
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.742

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.