Literature DB >> 17021408

Early clinical and radiologic outcomes of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis.

Chan Shik Shim1, Sang-Ho Lee, Hyun-Ju Park, Han-Sug Kang, Ji-Hee Hwang.   

Abstract

Among 61 patients underwent disc replacement with the Bryan prosthesis, 47 patients were followed more than 3 months and their clinical and radiologic data were retrospectively analyzed to clarify very early clinical and radiologic outcomes and complications of disc arthroplasty with the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis during the learning period. Mean follow-up period was 6 months. Mean age was 45.6 years. Single-level procedure was done in 39 patients and 2-level in 8; a total of 55 levels replaced. Neck disability index improved from 59.8% to 22.9%. Visual analog pain score (VAS) of the neck improved from 8.4 to 1.6. VAS of shoulder/arm pain improved from 8.8 to 2.4. Mean patients' subjective improvement rate of symptoms was 71.1%. According to improvement in the neck disability index and VAS (over 50% improvement rate in each parameter), patients' subjective improvement rate (over 50%), and patients' satisfaction, the surgical success was achieved in 39 patients (83%). Eight patients (17%) showed failure. Mean segmental angle became more kyphotic after surgery from -0.7 degree of kyphosis (-11 to 7.7 degrees) to -1.3 degrees (-32 to 20.9 degrees) without statistical significance (P=0.55). Among 24 segments that showed preoperative kyphosis, 13 (54.2%) showed aggravated kyphosis, 7 (29.1%) showed decreased kyphosis and 4 (16.7%) recovered to lordosis. Among 31 segments that showed preoperative lordosis, 19 (61.3%) showed loss of lordosis and 12 (38.7%) showed increased lordosis. Mean range of motion increased significantly after surgery (6.7 to 8.5 degrees, P=0.04). Preoperative and postoperative segmental kyphosis was not related to clinical success. Cervical arthroplasty with the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis failed to restore segmental lordotic angle. A concern arises because it is well known that the fusion in kyphotic curvature causes more frequent problems on adjacent levels in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. For the present, it seems preferable to exclude the patient who already has significant segmental kyphosis from disc arthroplasty with Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17021408     DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211235.76093.6b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  10 in total

Review 1.  Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Rocco Papalia; Erika Albo; Leonardo Cortesi; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.

Authors:  Seok Woo Kim; Marc Anthony Limson; Soo-Bum Kim; Jose Joefrey F Arbatin; Kee-Young Chang; Moon-Soo Park; Jae-hyuk Shin; Yeong-Su Ju
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [The relevance of the sagittal profile in cervical artificial discs].

Authors:  C Carstens; M Carstens; F Copf
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Parameters that effect spine biomechanics following cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Vijay K Goel; Ahmad Faizan; Vivek Palepu; Sanghita Bhattacharya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparative analysis of cervical arthroplasty using mobi-c(r) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using the solis(r) -cage.

Authors:  Jin Hoon Park; Kwang Ho Roh; Ji Young Cho; Young Shin Ra; Seung Chul Rhim; Sung Woo Noh
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2008-10-30

Review 6.  The incidence of adjacent segment degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA): a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Baohui Yang; Haopeng Li; Ting Zhang; Xijing He; Siyue Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Prognostic factors related to motion dynamics following cervical arthroplasty with a bryan disc: average 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Han-Yong Heo; Sung-Jae Lee; Kwon-Yong Lee; Chun-Kun Park
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2008-06-01

8.  The Role of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in Cervical Disc Replacement: An Ovine Cadaveric Biomechanical Analysis.

Authors:  Cheng-Cheng Yu; Ding-Jun Hao; Yu-Li Ma; Da-Geng Huang; Hou-Kun Li; Hang Feng; Qian Hou
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-05-31

9.  Cervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige-LP for the treatment of contiguous 2-level cervical degenerative disc disease: 5-year follow-up results.

Authors:  Xinlin Gao; Yi Yang; Hao Liu; Yang Meng; Junfeng Zeng; Tingkui Wu; Ying Hong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Bryan total disc arthroplasty: a replacement disc for cervical disc disease.

Authors:  Markus Wenger; Thomas-Marc Markwalder
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2010-07-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.