Literature DB >> 17020900

Inferring myopia over the lifecourse from uncorrected distance visual acuity in childhood.

Phillippa M Cumberland1, Catherine S Peckham, Jugnoo S Rahi.   

Abstract

AIM: To report the usefulness of uncorrected distance visual acuity (DVA) at 16 years to "screen" for myopia status and to assess the lifetime risk of myopia, based on a national birth cohort.
METHODS: 1867 members of the 1958 British birth cohort for whom there were data on acuity at 16 years had autorefraction, as part of a biomedical survey, at 45 years. Reduced uncorrected DVA at age 16 years (6/12 or worse in both eyes) was compared with adult refraction (spherical equivalent).
RESULTS: Only a quarter of individuals in the population studied who had developed myopia by 45 years of age had reduced acuity at 16 years of age. Notably, half of all adults with moderate myopia (-2.99 to -5.99) and 31% (11/35) with severe myopia (> or =-6) had good uncorrected DVA in both eyes at 16 years of age. Thus, sensitivities were low, ranging from 16% for all myopia (cut-off point spherical equivalent -0.5) to 69% for severe myopia (cut-off point spherical equivalent -6). However, a high (91%) lifetime probability of primary myopia (spherical equivalent > or =-0.5) given a reduced uncorrected DVA at 16 years was found.
CONCLUSION: In this population, reduced uncorrected DVA in childhood is an inaccurate and inappropriate intermediate "phenotype" for capturing adult myopia status. However, our findings support assessment of DVA in secondary school children as an effective method of identifying refractive error (both myopia and hypermetropia).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17020900      PMCID: PMC1857620          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2006.102277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  14 in total

Review 1.  Myopia.

Authors:  Douglas R Fredrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

2.  The increasing prevalence of myopia: implications for Australia.

Authors:  K Rose; W Smith; I Morgan; P Mitchell
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.207

3.  Cohort profile: 1958 British birth cohort (National Child Development Study).

Authors:  Chris Power; Jane Elliott
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Genes and environment in refractive error: the twin eye study.

Authors:  C J Hammond; H Snieder; C E Gilbert; T D Spector
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Defining myopia using refractive error and uncorrected logMAR visual acuity >0.3 from 1334 Singapore school children ages 7-9 years.

Authors:  H-D Luo; G Gazzard; Y Liang; A Shankar; D T H Tan; S-M Saw
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Visual acuity testing in schools: what needs to be done.

Authors:  Y F Yang; M D Cole
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-10-26

7.  Refractive error and ethnicity in children.

Authors:  Robert N Kleinstein; Lisa A Jones; Sandral Hullett; Soonsi Kwon; Robert J Lee; Nina E Friedman; Ruth E Manny; Donald O Mutti; Julie A Yu; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08

Review 8.  Myopia: precedents for research in the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Bernard Gilmartin
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Ocular component data in schoolchildren as a function of age and gender.

Authors:  Karla Zadnik; Ruth E Manny; Julie A Yu; G Lynn Mitchell; Susan A Cotter; Julio C Quiralte; Melvin Shipp; Nina E Friedman; Robert N Kleinstein; Terry W Walker; Lisa A Jones; Melvin L Moeschberger; Donald O Mutti
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Sensitivity and specificity of visual acuity screening for refractive errors in school children.

Authors:  Louis Tong; Seang-Mei Saw; Donald Tan; Kee-Seng Chia; Wai-Ying Chan; Andrew Carkeet; Wei-Han Chua; Ching-Ye Hong
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  11 in total

1.  Morphological and clinical characteristics of myopic posterior staphyloma in Caucasians.

Authors:  Rino Frisina; Andrea Baldi; Bruno Mario Cesana; Francesco Semeraro; Barbara Parolini
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Ethnic differences in the prevalence of myopia and ocular biometry in 10- and 11-year-old children: the Child Heart and Health Study in England (CHASE).

Authors:  Alicja R Rudnicka; Christopher G Owen; Claire M Nightingale; Derek G Cook; Peter H Whincup
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Effectiveness of a novel mobile health (Peek) and education intervention on spectacle wear amongst children in India: Results from a randomized superiority trial in India.

Authors:  Priya Morjaria; Andrew Bastawrous; Gudlavalleti Venkata Satyanarayana Murthy; Jennifer Evans; Mekala Jayanthi Sagar; Dinesh Raj Pallepogula; Kalluri Viswanath; Clare Gilbert
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-10-17

4.  Uncorrected refractive error in older British adults: the EPIC-Norfolk Eye Study.

Authors:  Justin C Sherwin; Anthony P Khawaja; David Broadway; Robert Luben; Shabina Hayat; Nichola Dalzell; Nicholas J Wareham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Paul J Foster
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Risk factors for myopia in a discordant monozygotic twin study.

Authors:  Rishi Ramessur; Katie M Williams; Christopher J Hammond
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Traffic-related air pollution and spectacles use in schoolchildren.

Authors:  Payam Dadvand; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Xavier Basagaña; Mar Alvarez-Pedrerol; Albert Dalmau-Bueno; Marta Cirach; Ioar Rivas; Bert Brunekreef; Xavier Querol; Ian G Morgan; Jordi Sunyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Longitudinal Changes in Refractive Error Among Preschool Children Aged 1-6 Years: The Changsha Children Eye Study.

Authors:  Yuxia You; Ming Xu; Yali Song; Huanfen Zhou; Shihui Wei
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-23

8.  Assessment of Choroidal Vascularity and Choriocapillaris Blood Perfusion After Accommodation in Myopia, Emmetropia, and Hyperopia Groups Among Children.

Authors:  Xuejiao Chang; Mu Li; Liang Lv; Xiaoqin Yan; Ying Liu; Mengxia Zhu; Junming Wang; Ping Wang; Yan Xiang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 9.  Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of childhood myopia, a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis: implications for aetiology and early prevention.

Authors:  Alicja R Rudnicka; Venediktos V Kapetanakis; Andrea K Wathern; Nicola S Logan; Bernard Gilmartin; Peter H Whincup; Derek G Cook; Christopher G Owen
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  The Effect of Longer-Term and Exclusive Breastfeeding Promotion on Visual Outcome in Adolescence.

Authors:  Christopher G Owen; Emily Oken; Alicja R Rudnicka; Rita Patel; Jennifer Thompson; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Konstatin Vilchuck; Natalia Bogdanovich; Mikhail Hameza; Michael S Kramer; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.