PURPOSE: Ethnic differences in childhood prevalence of myopia have not been well characterized in the United Kingdom. In this study, ethnic differences in refractive status and ocular biometry were examined in a multiethnic sample of British children. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 10- and 11-year-old school children of South Asian, black African Caribbean, and white European ethnic origin. Vision, open-field autorefraction (without cycloplegia), and ocular biometry were measured in each eye. Myopia was defined as spherical equivalent refraction of -0.50 D with unaided vision of 20/30 or worse (in one or both eyes). Ethnic differences in the prevalence of myopia were examined by using logistic regression, and multiple linear regression was used for ethnic differences in ocular biometry. All models were adjusted for age, sex, and clustering within school. RESULTS: Data were available for 1179 children. The prevalence of myopia was 25.2%, 10.0%, and 3.4%, respectively, in the South Asian, black African Caribbean, and white European children. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of myopia compared with the white European children were 8.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0 to 19.4) in the South Asian and 3.2 (95% CI, 1.4 to 7.2) in black African Caribbean children. Ethnic differences in the prevalence of myopia were largely accounted for by ethnic differences in axial length. The South Asian and black African Caribbean children had longer axial lengths (0.44 mm; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.57 mm and 0.30 mm; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.44 mm, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among British children exposed to the same schooling environment, the South Asians had the highest prevalence of myopia, followed by the black African Caribbeans compared with the white Europeans. A quarter of British South Asian children were myopic, which is strongly related to increased axial length.
PURPOSE: Ethnic differences in childhood prevalence of myopia have not been well characterized in the United Kingdom. In this study, ethnic differences in refractive status and ocular biometry were examined in a multiethnic sample of British children. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 10- and 11-year-old school children of South Asian, black African Caribbean, and white European ethnic origin. Vision, open-field autorefraction (without cycloplegia), and ocular biometry were measured in each eye. Myopia was defined as spherical equivalent refraction of -0.50 D with unaided vision of 20/30 or worse (in one or both eyes). Ethnic differences in the prevalence of myopia were examined by using logistic regression, and multiple linear regression was used for ethnic differences in ocular biometry. All models were adjusted for age, sex, and clustering within school. RESULTS: Data were available for 1179 children. The prevalence of myopia was 25.2%, 10.0%, and 3.4%, respectively, in the South Asian, black African Caribbean, and white European children. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of myopia compared with the white European children were 8.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0 to 19.4) in the South Asian and 3.2 (95% CI, 1.4 to 7.2) in black African Caribbean children. Ethnic differences in the prevalence of myopia were largely accounted for by ethnic differences in axial length. The South Asian and black African Caribbean children had longer axial lengths (0.44 mm; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.57 mm and 0.30 mm; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.44 mm, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among British children exposed to the same schooling environment, the South Asians had the highest prevalence of myopia, followed by the black African Caribbeans compared with the white Europeans. A quarter of British South Asian children were myopic, which is strongly related to increased axial length.
Authors: G V S Murthy; Sanjeev K Gupta; Leon B Ellwein; Sergio R Muñoz; Gopal P Pokharel; Lalit Sanga; Damodar Bachani Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Robert N Kleinstein; Lisa A Jones; Sandral Hullett; Soonsi Kwon; Robert J Lee; Nina E Friedman; Ruth E Manny; Donald O Mutti; Julie A Yu; Karla Zadnik Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2003-08
Authors: Kovin S Naidoo; Avesh Raghunandan; Khathutshelo P Mashige; Pirindhavellie Govender; Brien A Holden; Gopal P Pokharel; Leon B Ellwein Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Christopher G Owen; Alicja R Rudnicka; Claire M Nightingale; Robert Mullen; Sarah A Barman; Naveed Sattar; Derek G Cook; Peter H Whincup Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2011-06-09 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Samuel Kyei; John Baptist Vianney Abowine; Ebenezer Zaabaar; Samuel Bert Boadi-Kusi; Frank Assiamah; Mohammed Abdul-Kabir; Kofi Asiedu Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2022-01-27 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: János Németh; Tennó Daiki; Gergely Dankovics; István Barna; Hans Limburg; Zoltán Zsolt Nagy Journal: Int J Ophthalmol Date: 2022-07-18 Impact factor: 1.645
Authors: Dinesh Kaphle; Katrina L Schmid; Leon N Davies; Marwan Suheimat; David A Atchison Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 4.925