Literature DB >> 17019759

The burden of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

M E Kruijshaar1, M Kerkhof, P D Siersema, E W Steyerberg, M Y V Homs, M-L Essink-Bot.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Patients with Barrett's esophagus are recommended to undergo regular surveillance with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, an invasive procedure that may cause anxiety, pain, and discomfort. We assessed to what extent patients perceived this procedure as burdensome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 192 patients with Barrett's esophagus were asked to fill out questionnaires at 1 week and immediately before endoscopy, and at 1 week and 1 month afterwards. Four variables were assessed: (i) pain and discomfort experienced during endoscopy; (ii) symptoms; (iii) psychological burden, i. e., anxiety, depression and distress levels (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale, Impact of Event Scale); and (iv) perceived risk of developing adenocarcinoma.
RESULTS: At least one questionnaire was returned by 180 patients (94 %), 151 completed all four (79 %). Of all patients, only 14 % experienced the endoscopy as painful. However, 59 % reported it to be burdensome. Apart from an increase in throat ache (47 % after endoscopy versus 12 % before), the procedure did not cause physical symptoms. Patients' anxiety, depression, and distress levels were significantly increased in the week before endoscopy compared with the week after. Patients perceiving their risk of developing adenocarcinoma as high reported higher levels of psychological distress and that the procedure was a greater burden.
CONCLUSIONS: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is burdensome for many patients with Barrett's esophagus and causes moderate distress. Perception of a high risk of adenocarcinoma may increase distress and the burden experienced from the procedure. The benefits of endoscopic surveillance for patients with Barrett's esophagus should be weighed against its drawbacks, including the short-term burden for patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17019759     DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-944613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  18 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetic biomarkers in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Andrew M Kaz; William M Grady
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 8.679

2.  The burden of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed with the patient under conscious sedation.

Authors:  S M Jeurnink; E W Steyerberg; E J Kuipers; P D Siersema
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Tethered capsule endomicroscopy: from bench to bedside at a primary care practice.

Authors:  Michalina J Gora; Leigh H Simmons; Lucille Quénéhervé; Catriona N Grant; Robert W Carruth; Weina Lu; Aubrey Tiernan; Jing Dong; Beth Walker-Corkery; Amna Soomro; Mireille Rosenberg; Joshua P Metlay; Guillermo J Tearney
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 4.  Patients' intuitive judgments about surveillance endoscopy in Barrett's esophagus: a review and application to models of decision-making.

Authors:  M Hinojosa-Lindsey; J Arney; S Heberlig; J R Kramer; R L Street; H B El-Serag; A D Naik
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.429

5.  Screening for Barrett's esophagus: results from a population-based survey.

Authors:  Milli Gupta; Timothy J Beebe; Kelly T Dunagan; Cathy D Schleck; Alan R Zinsmeister; Nicholas J Talley; G Richard Locke; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Health-related quality of life in patients with Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review.

Authors:  Seth D Crockett; Quinn K Lippmann; Evan S Dellon; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  Practice patterns of surveillance endoscopy in a Veterans Affairs database of 29,504 patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Hashem B El-Serag; Zhigang Duan; Marilyn Hinojosa-Lindsey; Jason Hou; Mohammad Shakhatreh; Aanand D Naik; G John Chen; Richard L Street; Jennifer R Kramer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Acceptability and accuracy of a non-endoscopic screening test for Barrett's oesophagus in primary care: cohort study.

Authors:  Sudarshan R Kadri; Pierre Lao-Sirieix; Maria O'Donovan; Irene Debiram; Madhumita Das; Jane M Blazeby; Jon Emery; Alex Boussioutas; Helen Morris; Fiona M Walter; Paul Pharoah; Richard H Hardwick; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-09-10

9.  Long-term psychosocial impact of alternative management policies in women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology referred for colposcopy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  L Sharp; S Cotton; N Gray; M Avis; I Russell; L Walker; N Waugh; D Whynes; C Woolley; A Thornton; L Smart; M Cruickshank; J Little
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Patient-centered, comparative effectiveness of esophageal cancer screening: protocol for a comparative effectiveness research study to inform guidelines for evidence-based approach to screening and surveillance endoscopy.

Authors:  Jennifer R Kramer; Jennifer Arney; John Chen; Peter Richardson; Zhigang Duan; Richard L Street; Marilyn Hinojosa-Lindsey; Aanand D Naik; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.