Literature DB >> 17019055

Age and sex effects on human mutation rates: an old problem with new complexities.

James F Crow1.   

Abstract

Base substitution mutations are far more common in human males than in females, and the frequency increases with paternal age. Both can be accounted for by the greater number of pre-meiotic cell divisions in males, especially old ones. In contrast, small deletions do not show any important age effect and occur with approximately equal frequency in the two sexes. Mutations in most genes include both types, and the sex and paternal age effect depends on the proportion of the two types. A few traits, of which Apert Syndrome is best understood, are mutation hot spots with all the mutations occurring in one or two codons, usually at one nucleotide. They occur with very high frequency almost exclusively in males and the frequency increases rapidly with paternal age. It has been suggested that the mutant cells have a selective advantage in the male germ-line prior to meiosis. Evidence for this surprising, but important, hypothesis is discussed. A possible mechanism is the conversion of asymmetrical stem-cell divisions into symmetric ones. Some traits with complex etiology show a slight paternal age effect. There is also a short discussion of the high deleterious mutation rate and the role of sexual reproduction in reducing the consequent mutation load.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17019055     DOI: 10.1269/jrr.47.b75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Res        ISSN: 0449-3060            Impact factor:   2.724


  31 in total

1.  Missing heritability: paternal age effect mutations and selfish spermatogonia.

Authors:  Anne Goriely; Andrew O M Wilkie
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Measurements of spontaneous rates of mutations in the recent past and the near future.

Authors:  Fyodor A Kondrashov; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A germ-line-selective advantage rather than an increased mutation rate can explain some unexpectedly common human disease mutations.

Authors:  Soo-Kyung Choi; Song-Ro Yoon; Peter Calabrese; Norman Arnheim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Paternal age and mortality in children.

Authors:  Jin Liang Zhu; Mogens Vestergaard; Kreesten M Madsen; Jørn Olsen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Age-related instability in spermatogenic cell nuclear and mitochondrial DNA obtained from Apex1 heterozygous mice.

Authors:  Kristine S Vogel; Marissa Perez; Jamila R Momand; Karina Acevedo-Torres; Kim Hildreth; Rebecca A Garcia; Carlos A Torres-Ramos; Sylvette Ayala-Torres; Thomas J Prihoda; C Alex McMahan; Christi A Walter
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.609

6.  The effect of parental age on NF1 patients in Turkey.

Authors:  P Sharafi; B Anlar; S Ersoy-Evans; A Varan; O F Yılmaz; M Turan; S Ayter
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-11-15

7.  The ups and downs of mutation frequencies during aging can account for the Apert syndrome paternal age effect.

Authors:  Song-Ro Yoon; Jian Qin; Rivka L Glaser; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Nancy S Wexler; Rebecca Sokol; Norman Arnheim; Peter Calabrese
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 8.  Ageing of the male germ line.

Authors:  Catriona Paul; Bernard Robaire
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  De novo mutations in neurological and psychiatric disorders: effects, diagnosis and prevention.

Authors:  Julie Gauthier; Guy A Rouleau
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 11.117

10.  Activating mutations in FGFR3 and HRAS reveal a shared genetic origin for congenital disorders and testicular tumors.

Authors:  Anne Goriely; Ruth M S Hansen; Indira B Taylor; Inge A Olesen; Grete Krag Jacobsen; Simon J McGowan; Susanne P Pfeifer; Gilean A T McVean; Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts; Andrew O M Wilkie
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 38.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.