Literature DB >> 17017056

Isolation by resistance.

Brad H McRae1.   

Abstract

Despite growing interest in the effects of landscape heterogeneity on genetic structuring, few tools are available to incorporate data on landscape composition into population genetic studies. Analyses of isolation by distance have typically either assumed spatial homogeneity for convenience or applied theoretically unjustified distance metrics to compensate for heterogeneity. Here I propose the isolation-by-resistance (IBR) model as an alternative for predicting equilibrium genetic structuring in complex landscapes. The model predicts a positive relationship between genetic differentiation and the resistance distance, a distance metric that exploits precise relationships between random walk times and effective resistances in electronic networks. As a predictor of genetic differentiation, the resistance distance is both more theoretically justified and more robust to spatial heterogeneity than Euclidean or least cost path-based distance measures. Moreover, the metric can be applied with a wide range of data inputs, including coarse-scale range maps, simple maps of habitat and nonhabitat within a species' range, or complex spatial datasets with habitats and barriers of differing qualities. The IBR model thus provides a flexible and efficient tool to account for habitat heterogeneity in studies of isolation by distance, improve understanding of how landscape characteristics affect genetic structuring, and predict genetic and evolutionary consequences of landscape change.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17017056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  175 in total

1.  Prioritizing tiger conservation through landscape genetics and habitat linkages.

Authors:  Bibek Yumnam; Yadvendradev V Jhala; Qamar Qureshi; Jesus E Maldonado; Rajesh Gopal; Swati Saini; Y Srinivas; Robert C Fleischer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A novel landscape genetic approach demonstrates the effects of human disturbance on the Udzungwa red colobus monkey (Procolobus gordonorum).

Authors:  M J Ruiz-Lopez; C Barelli; F Rovero; K Hodges; C Roos; W E Peterman; N Ting
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Beyond the continuum: a multi-dimensional phase space for neutral-niche community assembly.

Authors:  Guillaume Latombe; Cang Hui; Melodie A McGeoch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Using genetic data to estimate diffusion rates in heterogeneous landscapes.

Authors:  L Roques; E Walker; P Franck; S Soubeyrand; E K Klein
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations.

Authors:  Brad H McRae; Paul Beier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A new Bayesian method to identify the environmental factors that influence recent migration.

Authors:  Pierre Faubet; Oscar E Gaggiotti
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The influence of contemporary and historic landscape features on the genetic structure of the sand dune endemic, Cirsium pitcheri (Asteraceae).

Authors:  J B Fant; K Havens; J M Keller; A Radosavljevic; E D Yates
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Antagonistic selection factors induce a continuous population divergence in a polymorphism.

Authors:  Y Takahashi; N Nagata; M Kawata
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Influence of landscape features on the microgeographic genetic structure of a resident songbird.

Authors:  R V Adams; S E Lazerte; K A Otter; T M Burg
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Resistance and relatedness on an evolutionary graph.

Authors:  Wes Maciejewski
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.