Literature DB >> 17016755

Survival analysis and clinicopathological factors associated with false-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy findings in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

Zbigniew I Nowecki1, Piotr Rutkowski, Anna Nasierowska-Guttmejer, Wlodzimierz Ruka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the outcomes and factors associated with false-negative (FN) results of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy findings in patients with cutaneous melanoma. SLN biopsy failure rate was defined as nodal recurrence in the biopsied regional basin without previous local or in-transit recurrence.
METHODS: Between April 1997 and December 2004, a total of 1207 patients with cutaneous melanoma with a median Breslow thickness of 2.4 mm underwent SLN biopsy by preoperative and intraoperative lymphoscintigraphy combined with dye injection. In 228 cases, we found positive SLNs; of these, 220 underwent completion lymph node dissection (CLND). Median follow-up was 3 years.
RESULTS: The SLN biopsy failure rate was 5.8% (57 of 979 SLN negative). Median time to occurrence of FN relapse after SLN biopsy was 16 months (range, 3-74 months). The FN SLN biopsy results correlated with primary tumor thickness >4 mm (P = .0012), primary tumor ulceration (P = .0002), primary tumor level of invasion Clark stage IV/V (P = .0005), and nodular melanoma histological type (P = .0375). Five-year overall survival, calculated from the date of primary tumor excision, in the FN group was 53.7%, which was not statistically significantly worse than the CLND group (56.8%; P = .9). The FN group was characterized by a higher ratio of two or more metastatic nodes and extracapsular involvement of lymph nodes after LND compared with the CLND group (P < .0001 and P < .0001, respectively). Additional detailed pathological review of FN SLN revealed metastatic disease in 14 patients, which decreased the SLN biopsy failure rate to 4.4% (43 of 979).
CONCLUSIONS: Survival of patients with FN results of SLN biopsy does not differ statistically significantly from that of patients undergoing CLND, although it is slightly lower. The SLN biopsy failure rate is approximately 5.0% in long-term follow-up and is associated mainly with the same factors that indicate a poor prognosis in primary melanoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17016755     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-006-9066-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  24 in total

Review 1.  A review of sentinel lymph node biopsy for thin melanoma.

Authors:  K M Joyce; N M McInerney; C W Joyce; D M Jones; A J Hussey; P Donnellan; M J Kerin; J L Kelly; P J Regan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Follow-up after intraoperative sentinel node biopsy of N0 neck oral cancer patients.

Authors:  Akihiro Terada; Yasuhisa Hasegawa; Yasushi Yatabe; Nobuhiro Hanai; Taijiro Ozawa; Hitoshi Hirakawa; Takashi Maruo; Daisuke Kawakita; Shinji Mikami; Atsushi Suzuki; Takuya Miyazaki; Tsutomu Nakashima
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma: statistical analysis of 403 reported cases.

Authors:  Yoshitsugu Shibayama; Shinichi Imafuku; Akira Takahashi; Juichiro Nakayama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Management of regional lymph node basins in melanoma.

Authors:  Timothy P Love; Keith A Delman
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2010

Review 5.  Analysis of melanoma recurrence following a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Maggie Hodges; Edward Jones; Teresa Jones; Nathan Pearlman; Csaba Gajdos; Nicole Kounalakis; Martin McCarter
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2015-08-10

6.  Integrative genomics identifies molecular alterations that challenge the linear model of melanoma progression.

Authors:  Amy E Rose; Laura Poliseno; Jinhua Wang; Michael Clark; Alexander Pearlman; Guimin Wang; Eleazar C Vega Y Saenz de Miera; Ratna Medicherla; Paul J Christos; Richard Shapiro; Anna Pavlick; Farbod Darvishian; Jiri Zavadil; David Polsky; Eva Hernando; Harry Ostrer; Iman Osman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Primary Melanoma: from History to Actual Debates.

Authors:  Alessandro A E Testori; Stephanie A Blankenstein; Alexander C J van Akkooi
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Changes in the presentation of nodular and superficial spreading melanomas over 35 years.

Authors:  Melanie A Warycha; Paul J Christos; Madhu Mazumdar; Farbod Darvishian; Richard L Shapiro; Russell S Berman; Anna C Pavlick; Alfred W Kopf; David Polsky; Iman Osman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Utility of frozen-section analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy specimens for melanoma in surgical decision making.

Authors:  Weesam Alkhatib; Casey Hertzenberg; William Jewell; Mazin F Al-Kasspooles; Ivan Damjanov; Mark S Cohen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Who is to blame for false-negative sentinel node biopsies in melanoma?

Authors:  Vernon K Sondak; Jonathan S Zager
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.