Literature DB >> 17016223

Tribology of alternative bearings.

John Fisher1, Zhongmin Jin, Joanne Tipper, Martin Stone, Eileen Ingham.   

Abstract

The tribological performance and biological activity of the wear debris produced has been compared for highly cross-linked polyethylene, ceramic-on-ceramic, metal-on-metal, and modified metal bearings in a series of in vitro studies from a single laboratory. The functional lifetime demand of young and active patients is 10-fold greater than the estimated functional lifetime of traditional polyethylene. There is considerable interest in using larger diameter heads in these high demand patients. Highly cross-linked polyethylene show a four-fold reduction in functional biological activity. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have the lowest wear rates and least reactive wear debris. The functional biological activity is 20-fold lower than with highly cross-linked polyethylene. Hence, ceramic-on-ceramic bearings address the tribological lifetime demand of highly active patients. Metal-on-metal bearings have substantially lower wear rates than highly cross-linked polyethylene and wear decreases with head diameter. Bedding in wear is also lower with reduced radial clearance. Differential hardness ceramic-on-metal bearings and the application of ceramic-like coatings reduce metal wear and ion levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17016223     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238871.07604.49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  28 in total

1.  Low incidence of groin pain and early failure with large metal articulation total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  John B Meding; Lindsey K Meding; E Michael Keating; Michael E Berend
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Early dislocation rate in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kenny Mai; Mary E Hardwick; Richard H Walker; Steven N Copp; Kace A Ezzet; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2008-02

3.  [Reasons for failure of hip resurfacing implants. A failure analysis based on 250 revision specimens].

Authors:  M M Morlock; N Bishop; F Stahmer; J Zustin; G Sauter; M Hahn; M Krause; W Rüther; M Amling
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  'Pseudotumour' invading the proximal femur with normal metal ions following metal on metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Harry Krishnan; Kapil Sugand; Ibrahim Ali; Jay Smith
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-02-10

5.  Fatal Cobalt Cardiomyopathy Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty - A Brief Report with Review of Literature.

Authors:  Deepak Gautam; Ashish Pande; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-07

Review 6.  Revision total hip arthroplasty for metal-on-metal failure.

Authors:  Justin S Chang; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-10-04

Review 7.  The future role of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Hemant G Pandit; David W Murray; Ronan B C Treacy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Bone mineral density of the femoral neck in resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeannette Østergaard Penny; Ole Ovesen; Kim Brixen; Jens-Erik Varmarken; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Risk of complication and revision total hip arthroplasty among Medicare patients with different bearing surfaces.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Steven M Kurtz; Thomas P Vail; Harry E Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  2009 Nicolas Andry Award: clinical biomechanics of third body acceleration of total hip wear.

Authors:  Thomas D Brown; Hannah J Lundberg; Douglas R Pedersen; John J Callaghan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.