Literature DB >> 17016173

Complications after microvascular breast reconstruction: experience with 1195 flaps.

Babak J Mehrara1, Timothy D Santoro, Eric Arcilla, James P Watson, William W Shaw, Andrew L Da Lio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction is an important adjunct to breast cancer management. This study evaluated the frequency of major and minor complications in the largest reported series of consecutive mastectomy patients treated with free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction.
METHODS: All patients treated with microvascular breast reconstruction at the University of California, Los Angeles, Medical Center over an 11-year period were identified using a retrospective analysis. Frequency of complications was assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 1195 breast reconstructions were performed in 952 patients. Transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps were used in most cases (81.8 percent), whereas the superior gluteal musculocutaneous flap (10.1 percent) and other free flaps were used in the remaining patients. The overall complication rate was 27.9 percent and consisted primarily of minor complications (21.7 percent). Major complications were noted in 7.7 percent, including six total flap losses (0.5 percent). Obesity was a major predictor of complications. Smoking was not associated with increased rates of overall or microsurgical complications. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was also an independent predictor of complications and was associated with wound-healing problems and fat necrosis. Prior abdominal surgery in transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap patients increased the risk of partial flap loss, fat necrosis, and donor-site complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgical breast reconstruction is a safe and highly effective technique. Complications tend to be minor and do not affect postreconstruction adjuvant therapy. Obesity is a major predictor of flap and donor-site complications, and these patients should be appropriately counseled. Similarly, neoadjuvant preoperative chemotherapy and prior abdominal surgery increase the rates of minor complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17016173     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000236898.87398.d6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  30 in total

1.  Update on breast reconstruction techniques and indications.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Petit; Mario Rietjens; Visnu Lohsiriwat; Piercarlo Rey; Cristina Garusi; Francesca De Lorenzi; Stefano Martella; Andrea Manconi; Benedetta Barbieri; Krishna B Clough
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennica Platt; Nancy Baxter; Toni Zhong
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: predictors of complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Sophocles H Voineskos; Simon G Frank; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

4.  The effect of abdominal wall plication on intra-abdominal pressure and lower extremity venous flow: a case report.

Authors:  Christopher J Pannucci; Amy K Alderman; Sandra L Brown; Thomas W Wakefield; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Complications in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: One-year Outcomes of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium (MROC) Study.

Authors:  Edwin G Wilkins; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; John Y Kim; Richard J Greco; Ji Qi; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and short-term morbidity in patients undergoing mastectomy with and without breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Nicholas B Abt; José M Flores; Pablo A Baltodano; Karim A Sarhane; Francis M Abreu; Carisa M Cooney; Michele A Manahan; Vered Stearns; Martin A Makary; Gedge D Rosson
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Microsurgical refinements with the use of internal mammary (IM) perforators as recipient vessels in transverse upper gracilis (TUG) autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Samer Saour; Guido Libondi; Venkat Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

8.  Risk Factors Associated With Complications After Unilateral Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A French Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Jacques Dauplat; Emilie Thivat; Philippe Rouanet; Emmanuel Delay; Krishna Clough; Jean-Luc Verhaeghe; Ines Raoust; Marie Bannier; Perig Lemasurier; Christophe Pomel
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  A multiple logistic regression analysis of complications following microsurgical breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Samir Rao; Ellen C Stolle; Sarah Sher; Chun-Wang Lin; Bahram Momen; Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2014-11

10.  Quantitative assessment of perfusion and vascular compromise in perforator flaps using a near-infrared fluorescence-guided imaging system.

Authors:  Aya Matsui; Bernard T Lee; Joshua H Winer; Rita G Laurence; John V Frangioni
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.