Literature DB >> 17014816

Obesity and retropubic surgery for stress incontinence: is there really an increased risk of intraoperative complications?

R G Rogers1, U Lebküchner, D N Kammerer-Doak, P K Thompson, M D Walters, I E Nygaard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of obesity on length of surgery, blood loss, and intra- and postoperative complications in women who underwent retropubic surgery for stress urinary incontinence. STUDY
DESIGN: Of 449 women participating in a multicenter, randomized trial evaluating antibiotic prophylaxis in women with suprapubic catheters, 250 women underwent retropubic anti-incontinence procedures. This is a prospective nested cohort study of these women, 79 (32%) of whom were obese (body mass index 30 or greater) and 171 (68%) overweight or normal weight (body mass index less than 30). Data collected included demographic variables, past medical history, physical examination, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Data were analyzed with Fisher's exact for dichotomous variables, Student t tests for continuous variables, and analysis of variance for multivariate analysis. Significance was set at P < .05.
RESULTS: Obese women undergoing stress urinary incontinence surgery were younger than nonobese women (48.7 versus 51.9 years, respectively, P < .019). The number and type of additional surgeries performed were similar between groups with the exception that obese women were less likely to undergo abdominal apical suspensions (P = .006) or abdominal paravaginal repairs (P = .001); therefore, estimated blood loss, change in hematocrit, length of stay, surgery, and suprapubic catheterization comparisons are adjusted for the performance of these procedures. Estimated surgical blood loss was greater for obese women (344 versus 284 P = .03); however, change in hematocrit was lower for obese than nonobese women (6.6 versus 7.3, P = .048). Mean length of surgery was 15 minutes longer in obese women (P = .02). Length of hospital stay did not vary between groups (P = NS). Major intraoperative complications were uncommon (14 [5.6%]), with no difference between weight groups. Incidence of postoperative urinary tract infection, wound infections, or postoperative major complications were likewise similar between groups (all P > .05).
CONCLUSION: Surgery takes longer for obese patients, but blood loss as recorded by change in hematocrit is lower. Major complications were rare and similar between weight groups, as were infectious complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17014816     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Predictors of postoperative complications from stress urinary incontinence procedures: a NSQIP database study.

Authors:  Marissa L Bonus; Douglas Luchristt; Oluwateniola Brown; Sarah Collins; Kimberly Kenton; C Emi Bretschneider
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 1.932

2.  Complications in women undergoing Burch colposuspension versus autologous rectus fascial sling for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Toby C Chai; Michael E Albo; Holly E Richter; Peggy A Norton; Kimberly J Dandreo; Kimberly Kenton; Jerry L Lowder; Anne M Stoddard
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Obesity and pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  W Jerod Greer; Holly E Richter; Alfred A Bartolucci; Kathryn L Burgio
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Obesity and outcomes after sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Catherine S Bradley; Kimberly S Kenton; Holly E Richter; Xin Gao; Halina M Zyczynski; Anne M Weber; Ingrid E Nygaard
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Do severe obese patients with stress urinary incontinence benefit from transobturator tape procedure? 3-year surgical outcome.

Authors:  Tarik Yonguc; Ozgu Aydogdu; Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Tansu Degirmenci; Bulent Gunlusoy; Volkan Sen; Serkan Yarimoglu
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Variation in surgical treatment advice for women with stress urinary incontinence: a study using clinical case vignettes.

Authors:  Jil Billy Mamza; Rebecca Geary; Dina El-Hamamsy; Ipek Gurol; Jonathan Duckett; Tahir Mahmood; Ash Monga; Philip Toozs-Hobson; Andrew Wilson; Douglas Tincello; Jan Van der Meulen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Effect of weight loss on urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Emily L Whitcomb; Leslee L Subak
Journal:  Open Access J Urol       Date:  2011-08-01

Review 8.  Obesity and Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Andrzej Pomian; Wojciech Lisik; Maciej Kosieradzki; Ewa Barcz
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-06-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.