Literature DB >> 17014679

Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why?

A C E Angeja1, A E Washington, J E Vargas, R Gomez, I Rojas, A B Caughey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Caesarean section rates in Chile are reported to be as high as 60% in some populations. The purpose of this study was to determine pregnant Chilean women's preferences towards mode of delivery.
DESIGN: Interviewer-administered cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: Prenatal clinics in Santiago, Chile. Population Pregnant women in Santiago, Chile.
METHODS: Of 180 women completing the questionnaire, 90 were interviewed at a private clinic (caesarean delivery rate 60%) and 90 were interviewed at a public clinic (cesarean delivery rate 22%). Data collected included demographics, preferred mode of delivery, and women's attitudes towards vaginal and caesarean deliveries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mode of delivery preferences, perceptions of mode of delivery measured on a 1-7 Likert scale.
RESULTS: The majority of women (77.8%) preferred vaginal delivery, 9.4% preferred caesarean section, and 12.8% had no preference. There was no statistical difference in preference between the public clinic (11% preferred caesarean) and the private clinic (8% preferred caesarean, P= 0.74). Overall, women preferring caesarean birth were slightly older than other groups (31.6 years, versus 28.4 years for women who preferred vaginal and 27.3 years for women who had no preference, P= 0.05), but there were otherwise no differences in parity, income, or education. On a scale of 1-7, women preferring caesarean birth rated vaginal birth as more painful, while women preferring vaginal birth rated it as less painful (5.8 versus 3.7, P= 0.003). Whether vaginal or caesarean, each group felt that their preferred mode of delivery was safer for their baby (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Chilean women do not prefer caesarean section to vaginal delivery, even in a practice setting where caesarean delivery is more prevalent. Thus, women's preferences is unlikely to be the most significant factor driving the high caesarean rates in Chile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17014679     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01069.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  29 in total

1.  Treating mild gestational diabetes mellitus: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Mika S Ohno; Teresa N Sparks; Yvonne W Cheng; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Preventive induction of labor: potential benefits if proved effective.

Authors:  Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Awareness and Perceptions of and Attitudes towards Caesarean Delivery among Antenatal.

Authors:  Rk Adageba; Ka Danso; A Adusu-Donkor; F Ankobea-Kokroe
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2008-12

4.  Women's Preferences Regarding the Processes and Outcomes of Trial of Labor After Cesarean and Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Anjali J Kaimal; William A Grobman; Allison S Bryant; Laura Norrell; Yamilee Bermingham; Anna Altshuler; Mari-Paule Thiet; Juan Gonzalez; Peter Bacchetti; Michelle Moghadassi; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Mode of delivery preferences in a diverse population of pregnant women.

Authors:  Lynn M Yee; Anjali J Kaimal; Kathryn A Houston; Erica Wu; Mari-Paule Thiet; Sanae Nakagawa; Aaron B Caughey; Atoosa Firouzian; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Gestational diabetes screening with the new IADPSG guidelines: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  John F Mission; Mika S Ohno; Yvonne W Cheng; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Cesarean delivery as a barrier for breastfeeding initiation: the Puerto Rican experience.

Authors:  Naydi Pérez-Ríos; Gilberto Ramos-Valencia; Ana Patricia Ortiz
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 2.219

8.  U.S. Nulliparas' Reasons for Expected Provider Type and Childbirth Setting.

Authors:  Adriana Arcia
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2015

Review 9.  Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  A Mazzoni; F Althabe; N H Liu; A M Bonotti; L Gibbons; A J Sánchez; J M Belizán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 7.331

10.  Trinidadian women's knowledge, perceptions, and preferences regarding cesarean section: How do they make choices?

Authors:  K Mungrue; C Nixon; Y David; D Dookwah; S Durga; K Greene; H Mohammed
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-11-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.