Literature DB >> 17013713

Primary closure of the common bile duct in open laparotomy for common bile duct stones.

Masato Yamazaki1, Hideki Yasuda, Souichirou Tsukamoto, Yoshio Koide, Tsutomu Yarita, Tohru Tezuka, Tomohiro Takenoue, Chihiro Kosugi, Maki Sugimoto, Shiho Yamamoto, Shuuji Naka.   

Abstract

It is common these days to treat common bile duct (CBD) stones using endoscopic techniques. However, severe complications sometimes lead to death despite the great benefit of these techniques. If the patient has many and/or large stones, it can take considerable time for duct clearance, and this is associated with high costs. Therefore, we do not hesitate to choose surgical procedures when necessary. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of primary closure of the CBD in open laparotomy for CBD stones. Thirty-four patients with CBD stones were operated on by open laparotomy; primary closure was done in 17 patients (group PC), and T-tube insertion was done in 17 (group TT). We compared the patients' medical records, clinical features, laboratory data, complications, and postoperative hospital admission days. There were no significant intergroup differences in patients' medical records, clinical features, or laboratory data, except for the number of CBD stones. There were no differences in complications. All complications were minor and needed no extra care. The number of postoperative hospital admission days showed a significant difference: 18.3 days in group PC and 31.5 in group TT. There are so many methods to treat CBD stones now that the selection of the procedure can be important for the patient's benefit. We prefer primary closure, to get better quality of life postoperatively and to avoid further operations and any severe complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17013713     DOI: 10.1007/s00534-005-1097-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg        ISSN: 0944-1166


  6 in total

1.  Closure of the Common Duct -Endonasobiliary Drainage Tubes vs. T Tube: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Mehmood A Wani; Nisar A Chowdri; Sameer H Naqash; Fazl Q Parray; Rauf Ahmad Wani; Nazir A Wani
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Qian D Zhu; Chong L Tao; Meng T Zhou; Zheng P Yu; Hong Q Shi; Qi Y Zhang
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Surgical (Open and laparoscopic) management of large difficult CBD stones after different sessions of endoscopic failure: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Emad Hamdy Gad; Hazem Zakaria; Yasmin Kamel; Ayman Alsebaey; Talat Zakareya; Mohamed Abbasy; Anwar Mohamed; Ali Nada; Mohammed Alsayed Abdelsamee; Mohamed Housseni
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-05-31

4.  Percutaneous extraction of residual post-cholecystectomy gallstones through the T-tube tract.

Authors:  Jan Sobstyl; Michał Sojka; Maryla Kuczyńska; Łukasz Światłowski; Ewa Kuklik; Tomasz Jargiełło
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-07

Review 5.  Laparoscopic T-tube choledochotomy for biliary lithiasis.

Authors:  Denzil Garteiz Martínez; Alejandro Weber Sánchez; María Elena López Acosta
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Various techniques for the surgical treatment of common bile duct stones: a meta review.

Authors:  Abolfazl Shojaiefard; Majid Esmaeilzadeh; Ali Ghafouri; Arianeb Mehrabi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 2.260

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.