Literature DB >> 17011396

Cesarean delivery on request: reproductive consequences.

Melissa Gilliam1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to examine the long term reproductive health consequences of cesarean delivery on maternal request.
FINDINGS: In the first delivery, cesarean delivery appears to hold small risk of reproductive complications compared to vaginal delivery. Primary cesarean delivery can affect subsequent pregnancies. The most serious reproductive health consequences of prior cesarean delivery occur in subsequent pregnancies. These complications include: unexplained fetal death apparent from 34 weeks gestation onward; abnormalities of placentation which increase with a greater number of cesarean deliveries; risk of uterine rupture and uterine scar dehiscence.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary cesarean delivery carries risk for subsequent pregnancies. While the studies reviewed do not specifically refer to cesarean delivery on request, it is likely that the results would be similar. Overall, in considering the specific question of long term reproductive health, the risks of maternal request cesarean delivery outweigh the benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17011396     DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Perinatol        ISSN: 0146-0005            Impact factor:   3.300


  18 in total

1.  The Florida Investigation of Primary Late Preterm and Cesarean Delivery: the accuracy of the birth certificate and hospital discharge records.

Authors:  Heather B Clayton; William M Sappenfield; Elizabeth Gulitz; Charles S Mahan; Donna J Petersen; Kara M Stanley; Hamisu M Salihu
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-07

2.  Speaking out! Qualitative insights on the experience of mothers who wanted a vaginal birth after a birth by cesarean section.

Authors:  Pam McGrath; Emma Phillips; Grahame Vaughan
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Experience of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: A Phenomenological Study.

Authors:  Silvio Simeone; Filomena Stile; Guillari Assunta; Gianpaolo Gargiulo; Teresa Rea
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2019-07-01

4.  Evaluating risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rate as a measure of obstetric quality.

Authors:  Sindhu K Srinivas; Corinne Fager; Scott A Lorch
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of uterine scar after previous caesarean section: comparison with 3T-magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Federica Fiocchi; Elisabetta Petrella; Luca Nocetti; Serena Currà; Guido Ligabue; Tiziana Costi; Pietro Torricelli; Fabio Facchinetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 6.  Indications for and Risks of Elective Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Ioannis Mylonas; Klaus Friese
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Large reductions in cesarean delivery rates in China: a qualitative study on delivery decision-making in the era of the two-child policy.

Authors:  Eileen Wang; Therese Hesketh
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Ultrasound diagnosis of caesarean scar defects.

Authors:  Jane Fonda
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

9.  The Ontario Mother and Infant Study (TOMIS) III: a multi-site cohort study of the impact of delivery method on health, service use, and costs of care in the first postpartum year.

Authors:  Wendy Sword; Susan Watt; Paul Krueger; Lehana Thabane; Christine Kurtz Landy; Dan Farine; Marilyn Swinton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  A descriptive analysis of the indications for caesarean section in mainland China.

Authors:  Yajun Liu; Guanghui Li; Yi Chen; Xin Wang; Yan Ruan; Liying Zou; Weiyuan Zhang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.